The Federal Communications Commission today issued a record fine of $299,997,000 against a robocall operation that specialized in auto warranty scam calls, the FCC announced, calling it “the largest illegal robocall operation the agency has ever investigated.”

  • darmabum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    A couple of guys from Texas who have been banned and fined before but just keep ignoring the Feds and spamming anyway. But this part caught my eye:

    Cox was banned from telemarketing in a 2013 settlement with the FTC, which accused him of sending “illegal robocalls offering credit card interest rate reduction programs, extended automobile warranties, and home security systems.” At the time, the FTC said that Cox was issued “a $1.1 million civil penalty that will be suspended due to his inability to pay.”

    In 2017, the FTC obtained a similar telemarketing ban on Jones. He was also fined $2.7 million, but, as with Cox, the fine was “suspended based on his inability to pay.”

    • Treczoks@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US puts people behind bars for nearly no reason, but someone who does not pay a >1m fine and continues to do illegal stuff runs around free?

      Here it would be one day of prison for the equivalent of two days income. Put those spammers behind bars where they belong.

        • Treczoks@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The problem here is that the influential people have secretaries or butlers that simply screen such calls. If representatives or senators would get bombed with unfiltered spam calls like normal people, those spammers would work in chain gangs until they drop dead.

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If your crime is financial in nature and widespread you dont go to jail.

            • Treczoks@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They actually changed the rate a short time ago. Before that it was a 1:1 relationship, but it sent poor people to prison for too long for simple things like being repeatedly caught without a valid ticket on a train or bus.

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Dammit, I thought that first sentence meant Cox Communications, the cable company.

      Also fucking garnish their wages!

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          On the one hand, vigilantism is a terrible thing.

          On the other hand, it’s a symptom of a dysfunctional justice system. That root cause must be addressed, and if it’s not then vigilantism is the natural “punishment” for the broken system itself.

  • Syo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought, finally some regulation… Only to read the fine can’t be collected because “inability to pay” over their robo call operations.

    I think US has dropped to ball trying to hold criminals accountable, and we just end up taking our frustration out on the powerless by throwing the book at them and acting tough.

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seriously, stop dancing around with fines and fees already. They’re never going to pay them. You’re better off just sending a police team to raid their offices and operation before promptly jailing them.