They were funded by one and found success in another.

They would have made sense if one worked and they were funded by the same industry

Would have made sense if they simply found success in their results and published them

They said that it works when combining coffee and fruit. Which one paid for it? Both would have told the other industry to pay for the study. It’s definitely only coffee or “fruit”.

One was actually meaningful. Guessing fruit was actually beneficial and coffee paid the bill but it’s definitely a red flag to include both in the finding. Either coffee is good and fruit is meaningless, or the other way around.

Tbh, “fruit” is such a large category that there’s no way they studied every fruit. They “studied coffee” and added “fruit” so they could post a benefit. I love coffee but this study is bullshit.

Summa cum loude

Exactly, I’d argue it sucks because the “solutions” are so easy that people find them accidentally all the time, the difficult puzzle is not escaping.

Then I realized I didn’t open 30 tabs, I ate 30 tabs and the “server” was my brain

Also just as possible nobody believes her bullshit cause most of us have had parents like that. Don’t let it defeat you.

Main difference is crack addicts only destroy crack when they smoke it, these guys are destroying lives with each “hit” they take. I actually have respect and sympathy for the crack heads

They’re even more histologically related to each other than they are to anything else. Lips and anus look surprisingly similar under a microscope.

Came here to say this. Also a deceased person would make a better president by far

Hi functioning, I’m functioning high!

I was saying those instances love shitting on .ml specifically but whatever

Ironic coming from .ml

I thought Trump’s mouth was the Epstein ballroom

This is my grown up Christmas list

Unfortunately the only arrest trump is ever gonna get is cardiac.

I doubt it, but I prefer to believe he thought he could walk down the road, murder someone, buy a hotdog, then go down to the museum for a nice afternoon and nobody would care.

And he would’ve gotten away with it too, he just didn’t realize you have to be white for murder to be protected free speech.

Wondering had come through much worse than this unscathed, one of my favorite VPNs (that doesn’t over-advertise)

“I saw kids being shot, women, old people”

Gaza, Iran, or USA, didn’t have to read the rest to figure that out

Google is absolutely a snitch, but I’m glad they weren’t in this particular instance. They use AI to find and kill Palestinians, but they didn’t out the one white guy trying to get away so I guess it could be worse…

I totally agree that’s how it looks for her. It’s an example of a prisoners dilemma.

Short term it’s best to just make trump happy and try to salvage sanity from the bullshit.

Long term though, she’s just validating all the bullshit trump is doing, adding to his power, and telling him that if he screams loud enough he will always eventually get his way. Trump will be a worse person, Venezuela will be a temporary reprieve and then be worse off, and the whole world has a larger mess to clean up.

World would be so much better if people didn’t fall prey to prisoners dilemmas and actually made the best long term decision for everyone every time. Might be getting too late to ever see that world tbh.

Bottom line is nobody should be feeding the orange infant.