Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.
Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.
The ultimate question of philosophy…
“"Should I kill myself, or have a cup of coffee?”
-Camus
Everyone always lies.
I could care less.
We’ve probably all said a sentence that no other person in history has ever said.
Teach critical thinking skills as a pillar of the school curriculum and the population will be immunized preventing the spread.
Fists aren’t a cure to intolerance. Probably doesn’t hurt so knock yourself a nazi out. As long as force isn’t being used to prevent open discussion and debate, it would be most unwise to drive dangerous ideologies underground where they can’t be monitored and understood.
Why did 2 break up with zero?
Some 1 got between them!
Wait, that’s a real thing? I thought it was just a marketing stunt!
Agreed but the puritans that have to give it up before we can expect sites like this to overexpose themselves to legal action.
proofs of idiocy and/or bad faith they offer
Then a downvote is justified, same user or not.
100%
10 of the biggest
Always handy when a pop-sci article discredits itself without having to read it.
Can’t deradicalize extremists without engaging them. Not to say where and when that should happen, or that the moral argument is even relevant. As Popper said in the wake of WWII,
If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.
Who watches the watchers?
Meh, makes me feel a little better about our slide into dystopia knowing we had it coming are too damn lazy and apathetic to do anything about it.
Punishment? Huh, didn’t know the tax man doesn’t want me to make money.
Ai has no ficks to give to people who are not ready.
That’s… not relevant to my point at all.
Make it apple employees in store and Microsoft forums. If humans give bad advice 10% of the time and Ai (or any technological replacement) makes mistakes 1% of the time, you can’t point to that 1% as a gotcha.