saying their nickname is Mike Hunt or any other thing Bart Simpson pranked Moe with
I am always up for some skim reading and poor comprehension but in this case “or any other thing” implies the first thing is included, if you don’t want the first thing included you say “or anything”
George Santos is who I am thinking of, why are there so many of them in this closet!
I doubt the Simpsons made a Mike Hunt joke at 6pm
Him? Wasn’t he recently outted as a drag queen?
LTT is not a small platform. Let him suck it up.
Spotify and YouTube cost a lot to run, do you block ads or pay for premium?
So is the warning to stay away from this?
How are they going to enforce that? We had nicknames for most of our teachers and I don’t think any of those had approval.
It’s tricky.
You can come close to the perspective with what we call a “normal” lens (50mm focal length on full frame, 35mm on APS-C Crop sensors).
The other issue you have is that human vision is not a sharp rectangle and that it’s extremely dynamic. You can look around a scene and refocus your vision almost instantly, while a photograph provides one fixed viewpoint and focus.
One more thing to improve perspective in images can be the use of comparisons in the image. A mountain with a house or a person at the bottom can look bigger because our brain knows how big those things are and understands the scale. In the case of the spider I usually photograph them next to a coin, as most people will recognise how big that is.
It’s due to the field of view of the lens and perspective distortion.
Very annoying.
You see a huge mountain, you think “I’ll need a very wide lens to fit this in” and then the mountain looks very small.
Your computer should say what you tell it to say - so if I want to spoof my browser and OS I can do that right? Right?
You sound like you’ve just made up an unrelated example to dog whistle
Piracy doesn’t deprive anyone of goods.
Piracy should be used whenever you don’t want to pay for something
Shit man, imagine if LTT lost a few dollars
Why? Is floatplane free? Or just really bad.
Say no.
If you give them your raw files then they will essentially own your image and use it for whatever they want, edited how they want.
Provide Jpeg only, and with a maximum width of 2048px which is suitable for all social media.
Say you take these pictures for free, and a rider becomes famous, or dies, or in twenty years there’s an exhibition on the history of the sport - you want to be the person in control of those images.
Personally I wouldn’t bother. A lot of high street stores and supermarkets offer photo printing for a few pence per image and the quality is massively superior to those products.
Katrin Eismann books on Photoshop are ok but a bit dated, you can probably find them online. The problem with Adobe CC is by the time a book is written it’s already out of date, so the best resources in my opinion are probably YouTube videos. Lynda.com/LinkedIn has a few bits, so does skillshare, probably good for a beginne but lacking in advanced skills. There’s loads on Udemy but it’s mostly absolute garbage so be careful, even if the course is on some sort of 90% sale it might not be worth it.
My advice would be to do a basic intro course, and then start editing, everytime you get stuck google the solution or watch a video on that topic.
One watchout with YouTube is the styles are all very samey and they will push you towards a certain look.
Niche content unfortunately, British sitcom BTS documentary
Also just looked at its been pulled from Plex, it shows in the listing but can’t be warched