Don’t insult melted ice cream

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1992/10/21/addressing-a-former-president/74852958-5995-4068-9f91-a6851bb893a5/

A quick Google on why. There’s lots of similar sources.

It’s a lifelong title.

The problem is risk. A lot of the bureaucracy that exists for any company is risk mitigation. The wiping of servers, or using suction cups, or any of that is a security against a large dollar amount to spend if something goes wrong. But that’s just the cost of security, it’s worthless if it isn’t tested. If a locked door isn’t rattled or deter someone, it might as well have been unlocked.

He took a gamble and the doors were not rattled and everything worked. The thing to criticize here is really the carelessness. What if one of those servers got out and somebody stole all of that data? What if while under those floorboards he got damaged, or something related did? And it’s not just these two questions, there’s stuff in that article that probably wasn’t covered that we can question.

There may be things that are not in the book that we can question, and that is the problem with Elon. He needs a string of bad luck to show how truly dangerous he is.

Elon is a Trump level business leader 🙄

People who make decisions like this don’t know what a sitemap is. They probably think CNET is an app.

I don’t know about that – if they have any good tech leadership, it’d combat that type of thinking. Hopefully.

They could have taken those articles out of the sitemap and get the same results.

How were you using it wrong?

They upgraded 5 days ago – unless upgrades to automatic posts to a community…