Oh I stand corrected. Nice find!
Oh I stand corrected. Nice find!
I don’t think they are, but definitely reminiscent.
Is this a joke?
Half the icons on the screen are Dunkin Donuts or McDonald’s and any time you stop at a light a banner add covers have the screen.
deleted by creator
They have those in the US too.
Such an obvious scam. “Do this thing that might lower your rates.”*
~in 99.99% of cases rates increased~
Isn’t everyone’s phone also their refrigerator?
Why would we compare it against an average coder?
ChatGPT wants to be a coding aid/reference material. A better baseline would be the top rated answer for the question on stackoverflow or whether the answer exists on the first 3 Google search results.
deleted by creator
I didn’t believe you, but was surprised to learn this is actually true.
The goods inside these stores — Doritos, sunglasses, lotto tickets, energy drinks — only account for ~30% of the average gas station’s revenue, yet bring in 70% of the profit.
https://thehustle.co/why-most-gas-stations-dont-make-money-from-selling-gas
The law does apply to social media posts.
The social media company has to mark sponsored content and give users the means to do so themselves (when the partnership is between the user and a third party rather than the social media company).
Unfortunately it’s hard to prove and profitable to lie.
Brb. Gonna air gap my home real quick instead of updating windows.
Just fyi:
I don’t have nearly enough tinfoil for this
I’ve been asking why cars don’t have more obvious visual indicators since I was like 8 years old.
It’s pretty weird that we’re basically just working with 2 sets of lights and blinkers at this point.
For AV’s specifically, a pretty significant/obvious missed feature is some indicator that the car “sees” you. Pedestrians make eye contact with drivers to check if crossing is safe. How is there no equivalent for AV’s??? It’s such an obvious miss.
It’s okay. I’ve misspelled “peek” as “peak” multiple times in the last week.
English just be like that.
Lot of armchair philosophists disagreeing with you, but you’re right.
Sure, some people make art for art’s sake. But it doesn’t put food on the table. Like it or not, most popular media is created at least in part as a source of income for the creator.
It’s fine to pirate things if you actually can’t/wouldn’t otherwise engage with the media. But at least be honest with yourself and recognize that you’re stealing income from the creator.
It will also contradict itself and make the same mistakes even if you point them out.
Can be useful as a starting point, but you basically need to fact check everything it says.
3rd sentence of the article:
If you follow the article to the press release: