As far as I know, everything would work fine. If it’s something you can do right-side-up, up-side-down, or prone, and in each orientation it works exactly the same way, it should work in zero G. It’s just hydraulics anyway. Not gravity dependant.
The fact they made the whole thing flesh colored and not just the head makes it so much worse somehow…
Trying to avoid YouTube (I hate that my phone chaged the case from lowercase on its own) is hard.
The watch here option is still a YouTube stream, it just doesn’t open it in the YouTube app or open YouTube in the browser.
You can up your trifecta to a quadrella if you also do Crossfit.
15 minutes to charge is more than road-trippable. Start the charger, stretch, go to the bathroom, get a drink, reply to messages you’ve gotten and didn’t respond to because you were driving and you are responsible, and it’s been more than 15 minutes!
… why should the investors get their money back? They invested ludicrous amounts of money into a technology with obvious limitations from the start with the intention of using that technology to replace many people’s jobs. Losing that money will be a better lesson than some probably unenforceable “pact”.
Yeah… as amazing as full dive VR would be, I’d be afraid that weaponized would be a better term for how it would be implemented than enshitified.
Umart sounds like Best Buy in the US. Fuck Best Buy.
That’s assuming they didn’t have AI write it. No brain engagement either way I suppose.
I think it’s a truck for regulatory reasons. Trucks get a pass on a bunch of things that can be a regulatory issue for cars, because of course they do.
They are offering kits to make it a van or SUV. Still no coupe, but better than a truck for many purposes.
I hate it too, and yes the current layout is way better. I’ll try it, but I might try other browsers too. I hate that most times a ui for a phone is updated it reduces the number of functions presented, becoming simpler and cartoony. Sometimes a feature or setting you used previously takes longer to get to, sometimes it’s gone. (Not firefox for the features being gone entirely part, that I’ve noticed)
My god. Somehow I hadn’t thought of doctors using LLMs to make decisions like that. But of course at least some do.
I like there being no requirement for a cloud account, but the storage being on a card in the camera seems vulnerable. What’s to keep someone from taking the card?
I would never expect a good analysis of a movie from an LLM. It can’t actually produce original thought, and can’t even watch the movie itself. It maybe has some version of the script in its training database, and definitely has things that people have said about the movie, and similar movies, and similar books, and whatever else they scraped. It it just returns words that are often grouped together and that have high likelihood of relevance to your query.
Well, one way or another it won’t be too many generations. Either we figure out it’s a bad idea or sooner or later things will go off the wheels enough that we won’t maintain the infrastructure to support everyone using this type of “AI”. Being kind of right 90% of the time is not good enough at a power plant.
That chart isn’t of “how low” the men in the study would go, it the age of the women ranked most attractive by the men in the study. Still isn’t great, agreed, but it is talking purely about physical attractiveness.
Here is the chart from the same study about what age ranges the men in the study said they would find acceptable to date. By 28 years old, 20 is no longer within the field.
Radiant heat is great for intermittent heating. Instead of heating a space, you heat the objects (and people) in the space, and that heat can be felt seconds after starting the heater. It doesn’t matter if the air temp is actually 2C if the radiant heat makes it feel like 22C.
No, their response did not validate that. In fact, they said the words “it’s not technically illegal”. There is a possibly illegal way to go about it, and a legal way, and no way to prove the difference, but that doesn’t equal technically illegal.
I didn’t feel you deserved the downvotes for your first question, provided it was in good faith. You’re right, like all common misconceptions, it’s best to present clear data wherever we can.
Yeah, drug names and Pokémon names are running into the same problem. They can’t reuse them, and there are so many already.
Actually, I suppose a name being used for a drug or a Pokémon precludes it from being used for the other, so it is a very shared issue, lol.
Wonder how far they have to reserve names in advance to prevent overlap. A Nintendo vs GSK court case for a name would be less absurd than many news stories this year.
I used to bartend and had to clean bathrooms after close. Can confirm, the women’s bathroom took longer to clean.