

Gluttony would be a better word.
Obesity is something else. People rarely actually want to be obese, but who is actually bothered by having too much money? I guess that makes the wording sound weird to me.


Gluttony would be a better word.
Obesity is something else. People rarely actually want to be obese, but who is actually bothered by having too much money? I guess that makes the wording sound weird to me.


OpenAI gave the sensitive content to an unsecure third party. Its a risky move, so they have responsability, regardless of this being a standard behaviour.


Calling that financial obesity is so weird.
It is.
Whats the issue with using their discovery servers? Has something changed regarding this?


Maybe thats a law where you live but ive definitely been contacted by a bunch of companies through wpp without having contacted them first.


Wdym suddenly?


Then who will be held responsible for its decisions?


I see what you mean now.
The person you responded to at first, i think they played along with that comparison to argue that, even if it was a disability, being annoying doesnt justify bullying. They werent saying it is a disability, they were using another persons premise to argue that bullying isnt justified.
I know some people that are annoying in a way that doesnt seem to be a choice, they have a natural way of behaving that annoys people. And sometimes, what seems to be a choice to be annoying is just manifestations of a persons natural characteristics. So I think we cant actually make a clear distinction between whats a voluntary behaviour and a natural uncensored behaviour. We should just learn to deal with people less aggressively.


Is the issue in choosing to do something differently? Voluntarily steping out of a cultural standard? Why is it such a pain in the ass? Did he write your consititution like this? Cant you just not read his comments if you dont want to?
I guess your sentiment is what helps humanity cosolidate any culture at all. But its way too big of a reaction, really…


Language evolution is not so much directed by utility, is it?


I dont mind it either


How is that ableist? I genuinely dont see it.


Anthropogenic*, no?
Morphic is about shape/form.
Genic is about origin, like we are causing the climate change.


Maybe has something to do with the type of colonisation in each country. Argentina had its first university in 1613, while Brazil had its first in 1808. Brazil as a colonial project kept its extractivist nature for a lot longer.
The 2.0 update was made into a new package in fdroid, so that you paid close attention to the upgrade, as it could maybe break things.


Remniscent of old vsauce


but the average people have been misled and lied to and been brainwashed for so long, they need to be forcibly broken out of that bubble. And the only way to force that is through a revolution, and authoritarian enforcement of the socioeconomic system.
That word “only” seems too pessimistic and unjustified, and your point relies too heavily on it.
Yess