• hottari@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t care about the licenses. If I click on my media and it refuses to play because some codec is omitted by default, am annoyed nonetheless.

    • bjorney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most distros have a checkbox during the installer that will add non-free components. It’s a separate EULA you need to agree to so they can’t do it for you.

      You may not care, but the distro provider’s legal team absolutely cares about not getting sued for automatically bundling components with an incompatible license agreement

      • hottari@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        The non-free components I’ve seen on installers are usually for Nvidia’s proprietary drivers. Not codecs.

        Sounds like legal panic if you ask me. There’s been no precedent for litigation on use of licensed codecs which most have been using either way prior in their builds and packages.

        • arglebargle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          MPEG LA is (now Via Licensing Alliance) has been active in collecting fees and defending patents. There is no reason to assume they won’t go after distros, particularly those who can pay given that they are willing to take on anyone else. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG_LA

          • hottari@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They have never gone after said distros all those many many years they have bundled licensed codecs in their ISOs. What changed?

            • arglebargle@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Because those distros have (as we are talking about) distanced themselves from the patent encumbered codecs? When Google tried to get behind VP8, MPEG LA was right there to try and stop them by trying to get them into the pool.

              Edit: I should have said many didn’t Fedora opted out of compiling mesa with hardware accell, and it seems others did too recently. But that means it was there the whole time. I guess most distros, that have any money, are going to want shelter from lawsuits.

    • hottari@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      More annoyed when the distro doesn’t even bother to document how to properly install the “missing” codecs.

        • hottari@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope. VLC uses system libraries, unless you install through something that ships its own dependencies like flatpak.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve heard it’s great for opening any file. Is it good with a bunch of file formats as opposed to media codecs?

            • hottari@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              VLC is good everywhere even though it cannot compare to MPV in number of features available. It will work for most people just fine.