After creating a fresh installation of Ubuntu 24.04, I installed DEB Firefox from APT by following Mozilla’s instructions from here. But I noticed that it was secretly replaced with Snap Firefox. I was able to verify this by checking the About Firefox page. This is the third time I noticed this.

  • beeng@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I… I… I don’t know why I haven’t done that myself. (Am now on NixOS btw) but for work maybe I ask for Debian cloud box.

    • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      For work, you could also try Fedora Workstation or Linux Mint Debian Edition. Debian is pretty barebones, but if that isnt a bother then do whatever.

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        It’s not barebones. I use it as my main desktop and barely notice any difference from Ubuntu, it has every package I’ve ever needed. I think that mentality of Debian being “bare” is outdated.

        @beeng@discuss.tchncs.de this is for you, too.

        • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I had a friend jump ship from Windows and they said that Debian felt barebones. I personally dont have any problem with it, I use it all the time for VMs, server, and I used to main it. I still think it is missing a lot of user-friendly small things that i never noticed on my own because I am very comfortable with Linux.

          • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            They do install less by default, but I’d love to pick their brain to understand what they meant. Oh well ¯_(ツ)_/¯

            • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Linux just isnt transparent about some things. Beginners most have problems when they use a GUI tool and then have to still edit a file. Like dirt example, adding a new drive using GUI disk utility and then sometime in the future disconnecting the drive and being forced into emergency mode.

              • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                I’d suggest the KDE flavor of Debian, then. Its settings manager is divine, and its software management platform ties every other package management system in (apt/dpkg for Debian, yum for Redhat, pacman for Arch, plus flatpak, nixpkg, and even snaps if you absolutely must). By default starting in Plasma 6.0.

                More to @fmstrat’s point, and to suggest a possible cause your friend had that impression: if you install the Minimal flavor of any distro, you’re going to get a minimal experience.

      • beeng@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I like gnome, but i guess i could look at fedora.

        I would like to stay with apt as package manager so the package names stay the same to what I know, or is yum/dnf/etc gonna use the same for most?

        • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          You can get Gnome on Fedora. It won’t have Apt.
          Packages will have a different naming scheme based on the maintainers’ preferences, even between Debian and Ubuntu (though those are usually pretty minor).
          Your muscle memory is gonna trip you up for a while though.