• Darren@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I dunno. I joined Mastodon back in 2022 and just…followed people.

    They weren’t the same people as on Twitter, but it didn’t really matter in the end. I now follow almost 600 people and never feel like my feed is empty.

    One social media site doesn’t have to be better than another, it just has to be sufficient for your needs.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      That takes a long time. I tried the same on Mastodon and ended up losing interest. I went to bluesky and just followed some starter packs and was up and running in less than an hour with 1000+ follows and a nice feed. Within a few weeks I had more than 700 followers myself.

      • Darren@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        See, I don’t understand why anyone would need to immediately follow that many randoms. And I don’t get the need to speedrun social media.

        But hey, it takes all sorts.

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          It’s investment vs payoff. I want to get a feed up and running, then I can tailor it as needed. My feed from using starter packs at Bluesky ended up better than 10+ years at Twitter trying to follow people individually, mostly because I was able to oursource the work of finding people with an interest in certain things to people who have put in the time to do this manually which I don’t have the desire to do.

          It may just be that the Twitter format isn’t a good fit for me, but it worked at Bluesky in a way it didn’t work anywhere else using that style of communication.