$2.5m in donations from the property industry to political parties since 2021. 97% of which has gone to National, Act & NZ First.

  • TagMeInSkipIGotThis@lemmy.nzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    In case you were wondering why National & Act were so keen to dump on poor people in order to give tax breaks to landlords, and are so keen to sell off more of our housing to overseas buyers, further doubling down on making NZ a basket case economy of selling houses to each other with a few tourism and farming bits tacked on.

  • gardner@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    So we do get the latest trends from the USA just 15 years later in this case…

    Buying political favours has turned that place into a hot mess inside a dumpster fire on a train wreck. I don’t want to watch it happen here.

  • SamC@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty worrying. There are proposals to reform the donations system, but zero chance they’ll go anywhere if National/Act/NZ First are in power. Labour should have acted on that when they had the chance.

    • Dave@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would have been nice if they had picked at least one of the recommendations from the 2012 review to implement, but at least they stated another review (that National might kill?).

      • SamC@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s also the more recent Independent Electoral Review, which including political donations/party funding: https://electoralreview.govt.nz/

        The final report is due to go to the Minister in November. If it’s a National minister, the whole thing will likely go straight to the trash.

        Actually, they will probably keep the referendum on longer parliamentary term… but nothing else.

        • Dave@lemmy.nzM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah that’s the one I was thinking of, I didn’ t realise they were nearly done.

          I wouldn’t mind if they pushed forward longer parliamentary terms, at least that’s one recommendation that could be actually implemented.

          • SamC@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It could be a fairly close if it went to a referendum. My problem with longer parliamentary terms is that it doesn’t seem to affect how many times a government wins re-election. So if you extend it to 4 years, you’ll regularly get governments in power for 12 years rather than 9, which means the politicians become even more comfortable/arrogant and less accountable than they are now.

            • Dave@lemmy.nzM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              If governments can make 12 year plans instead of 9 year plans, that’s a win in my book. Plus, they have even less of an excuse to not do anything.

              I think if politicians need to be help more accountable, then having more regular elections probably isn’t the best way. It makes the government less stable, which gives them an excuse to not do things.

              • SamC@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I guess I just look at countries like the UK (usually 5 year terms), and see all the same problems we have in NZ around governments not doing much, etc. So I don’t think longer terms will solve that at all. It just means you wait longer for a new government to come in, where they usually do stuff in the first term (often just the first year of their first term!) and then are too scared to do anything after that.

                • Dave@lemmy.nzM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Do places with 5 years terms typically still get 3 terms? It’s hard to imagine a country not getting bored with the ruling party after 10 years.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Labour should have acted on that when they had the chance.

      Sums up their second term, to be honest.

  • stellargmite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Newsroom reported donations just under the declarable limit were made in March 2019 to the foundation after a public relations consultant orchestrated a meeting with Hart’s son-in-law Duncan Hawkesby and NZ First MP Clayton Mitchell. An email from the PR consultant with the subject line “re CGT” said Mitchell’s stance on a capital gains tax aligned with Hawkesby’s. A meeting Hart briefly attended between Hawkesby and Mitchell occurred and three donations of $14,995 were made from different companies aligned with the family. In April 2019, then Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern confirmed a capital gains tax would not be introduced saying consensus could not be reached between parties in government. ”

    • a tiny investment for someone who holds billions in property. We are so easily sold out. And we’re about to be sold out yet again. Legal Corruption.
    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve said it before: our politicians sell themselves so cheaply it’s embarrassing.

      It’s like bribing children with lollipops.

      The shamelessness is galling.