• 420 Posts
  • 4.31K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle







  • Ideally, yes, if we are talking about communicating critical information to patients.

    However, the first issue is that the translator needs to be medically trained. If they aren’t, they risk translating critical technical information wrong. We can’t even get enough medical staff, let alone extras to be dedicated translators.

    There are also other circumstances where I don’t think a certified translator should be needed. For example, day to day interactions with a patient that aren’t about communicating critical medical information (e.g. asking how they are doing). I think most nurse interactions with patients would not justify a translator if the nurse spoke their language. Many doctor interactions would, but those are generally more structured and could have a translator organised in advance, unlike most nurse interactions.

    But also, as I mentioned there is likely a valid problem the memo is trying to address. The issue I see here is that the memo just decides the solution is that everyone has to speak English. This is just bad problem solving. They need to address the specific issues not have blanket rules that make the environment worse for patients.

    I suspect speaking to patients isn’t the problem (it’s not specifically mentioned in the memo), and so translators may not actually be relevant.




  • I have a parenting hack for a 5 minute break. Last night one of my kids was saying “Dad, dad, can you give me a challenge?”. Expecting things like hop around the house on one foot, or that sort of thing.

    I said “I bet you can’t sit still on a chair for 5 minutes”, this being a child who regularly falls off their chair at dinner time. They thought that was a great challenge, so I set a timer and the challenge was on. The look on their face made it look like they were concentrating harder than they had ever concentrated in their life, but they were really determined and managed to do it! And I got to sit down for a 5 min break 😮

    After that, the other kids wanted to have a turn too, but one of them decided that they could just pause the timer and do some thing they wanted to do. Of course that defeats the purpose, but they didn’t think so, so I think the hack won’t work again.









  • I’m not aware of an NZ example of a private company doing the full thing, but in the wider text I took my quote from they talk about trying to follow a Singapore model.

    The government has to be involved somewhere, firstly because they are the only ones that can take the land (and most projects would be unfeasible if they couldn’t do that), and secondly because the roads need to connect up to the state owned roads. Plus I guess resource consent and approval type stuff.

    Other than that, I don’t see why a private company couldn’t do it, if it was worth it economically. Which brings me to your point: is it worth it?

    I would guess that it’s very difficult to find a route that is valuable enough to users that they can charge a decent toll and people will pay it instead of going around, but also that has a high volume of traffic. Ultimately, we probably don’t have many (or any) such routes because these would be the first place that the government owned roads are built.

    What was that toll road north of Auckland with the big tunnel, one of the first ones? I wonder if there is data to show the cost of building it vs the revenue gained over the first 10 years or so.