fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThey quit their jobs. Their ex-employers sued them for training costswww.straitstimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1221arrow-down18
arrow-up1213arrow-down1external-linkThey quit their jobs. Their ex-employers sued them for training costswww.straitstimes.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareunfreeradical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoRight. I am only adding that its efficacy would diminish if it represented itself as pro-establishment. Those who understand its function as pro-establishment, and those who are not concerned, are the two groups that are least consequential. It is third, which you mentioned, who are most relevant, the ones who may be most easily influenced toward an effect that is substantial overall
Right. I am only adding that its efficacy would diminish if it represented itself as pro-establishment.
Those who understand its function as pro-establishment, and those who are not concerned, are the two groups that are least consequential.
It is third, which you mentioned, who are most relevant, the ones who may be most easily influenced toward an effect that is substantial overall