• sir_reginald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    strictest definitions? it does not meet either the free software definition originally given by the free software movement, nor the original definition of open source by Eric S Raymond, not the open source definition given by the Open Source Initiative, nor the definition given by Wikipedia.

    So this license does not meet any definition at all.

    I won’t elaborate on the other points because it’s clear we’re in disagreement here. I’m just saying that the license is NOT open source.