• 9bananas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    TOS are neither the law, nor are they vetted for legality by anyone working in law enforcement.

    TOS very often contain straight up illegal clauses; they are largely meaningless.

    • Yawnder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      My argument for that is “yesterday I ate some salad”. It’s just as relevant to what you just said because once again, it has nothing to do with what’s being said.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thats such an incoherent response.

        If you think it had nothing to do with the convo, maybe you shouldnt be chiming in on adult conversations until you can follow them.

        • Yawnder@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The whole chain of conversation is about immorality, and you talk about illegality. They are orthogonal concepts. They have nothing to do with one another.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If a company is writing illegal requirements, there is no moral backing for following them. They arent allowed to ask it of you.

            Go get your sippie and blankie. This conversation is too mature for you to handle.

            • Yawnder@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So something legal is moral, and something illegal is immoral? That’s your mature vision of things since you’re trying as hard as you can to link both?

              Then I guess civil forfeiture is moral, but driving 1km/h above the speed limit is immoral then… /s

              Also, you’re trying to fish for any makeshift argument you can muster, even if they’re bad. If you just look at the basic situation: someone is asking X to provide Y. You’re not willing to pay X to get Y. Taking Y from them without paying X is immoral, period. We’re not talking about an essential good that only them can provide. It’s not about insulin being 800$. (Which is legal, so I guess by your definition it’s moral…)

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Its cute that the salad guy thinks he can reason out a conversation.

                Its not immoral to violate an illegal requirement. Especially when they are already fully paid in my data. Do you need an adult to explain that to you? Im not paid to tutor kids, but Im sure you can ask your mother to hire someone.

                • Yawnder@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Since you have no actual arguments, and are just resorting to insulting times and again (and can’t understand that illegal and immoral have no link to one another…) I’ll just move on.