• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any employer may post any number of job openings at any time, and also may eliminate any of them, at any time, and also may eliminate any job, at any time, dismissing whoever is holding it.

    Serious question: are you currently working as an adult in the professional world?

    Because this is not what “jobs” are.

    • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A job is a social relationship between a worker and an employer.

      A job opening is a declaration by an employer of being willing to receive applications. If any application is accepted, by a job being offered to an applicant, then the applicant may accept the job, and may hold it, as long as the employer remains willing to maintain the employment relationship.

      A job opening is only a declaration.


      Do you understanding the meaning of bargaining power?

      Please think about the substantive meaning of the concept, and then provide a clear explanation, based on your understanding.

      Now, do the same for a company declaring a job opening. Explain the meaning, clearly.

      Please offer an explanation of how you may arrive, in general, at a sound conclusion, about which side of a negotiation has more bargaining power.

      Now, please provide a meaningful argument that job applicants have more bargaining power than employers.

      You have so far attempted to poison the well, but have not provided any genuine argument for your stated conclusion.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Job applicants are the girls on tinder. Many options and the choices are mutually exclusive.

        Employers are the guys on tinder. More of them than girls and some of them will not get girls (filled positions).

        The girl has her choice of guys, and can select for a higher standard. So can employees.

        Really not complicated. Basic supply and demand.

        • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No. Sorry.

          Either you are trolling, or you are simply extremely thoughtless in forming your beliefs.

          You reveal a complete lack of understanding of social structure.

          You have rifled through a handful a variations of the same general theme, attempting to argue, or perhaps attempting to avoid arguing, that employers have less bargaining power than employees.

          The employment relationship is not a relationship of mutuality or parity between the two participating parties, employer and employee.

          A business is a social structure, which is completely different from an individual worker. Meanwhile, the billionaires who own businesses, and through them accumulate private wealth, have no shared interests with their workers.

          Each business may expand to employ arbitrarily many workers, but workers have only limited time to sell.

          Businesses control the entirety of resources in society that the population requires to survive. They profit from the labor of workers, who sell their labor to earn the right to live.

          The number of job openings is not related to the bargaining power of employees.

          It cannot be overstated that your comparison to romantic partnership is so utterly absurd.