• Jonny@lemmy.rimkus.itEnglish
    1·
    2 years ago

    I create software by myself and disagree. First it’s very political where and for whom I choose to develop software. Second, software is always made for a purpose and the purpose can be indeed (and is) very often linked to political or social cause. E.g. a software which only purpose is to harm people, say for controlling mass destruction weapons is in my point of view a very political software

    • Puls3@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1·
      2 years ago

      software is always made for a purpose and the purpose can be indeed (and is) very often linked to political or social cause

      Its not though, typically software exists to serve a basic function at its core, and it could be used or contributed to by anyone for any number of things.

      • Panos Alevropoulos@lemmy.mlEnglish
        0·
        2 years ago

        You are thinking of software as if it exists in a vacuum. Software that is libre is a political statement. Software that is proprietary is also a political statement. Lemmy choosing to be decentralized/federated/interoperable is also a conscious political decision just as Apple chose to create its own proprietary ecosystem instead of caring about interoperability.

        • Ferk@lemmy.mlEnglish
          1·
          2 years ago

          You can grow potatoes for political reasons too. Everything a human being does might be politically motivated, but that doesn’t mean potatoes are political.

          Anyone can take that same software, that was created as a particular political statement, and use it for the completelly opposite political reasons to make a completelly different political statement. Just the same way as many have used songs in contexts that are completelly politically opposite to what the original author of the song intended.

          In the end, the only thing that’s political is the goal/purpose/motivation of an action, not the result of the action. No piece of software/hardware/thing is political when you dettach the artist from the art and just see it for what it is, regardless of what the author might have wanted you to see it as.