Google has reportedly removed much of Twitter’s links from its search results after the social network’s owner Elon Musk announced reading tweets would be limited.

Search Engine Roundtable found that Google had removed 52% of Twitter links since the crackdown began last week. Twitter now blocks users who are not logged in and sets limits on reading tweets.

According to Barry Schwartz, Google reported 471 million Twitter URLs as of Friday. But by Monday morning, that number had plummeted to 227 million.

“For normal indexing of these Twitter URLs, it seems like these tweets are dropping out of the sky,” Schwartz wrote.

Platformer reported last month that Twitter refused to pay its bill for Google Cloud services.

    • fluke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably some sort of rich person scheme that he can do whereby if his multi-billion dollar mistake ends up being a failure he can write it off and no longer be on the hook for it or something.

      Like bankruptcy, but only for twitter and not himself.

      • ShustOne@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        He can’t write off 44 billion though, he would get a tiny fraction of that and there are debts to pay back to investors.

        • fluke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think he’s interested ingetting it back, just to no longer be on the hook for it. I’m sure there’s no doubt various loopholes that he can use to wiggle out of the full consequences of his stupidity and hubris.

          • ShustOne@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So when you do a write off you still are responsible for that money. It’s not declaring bankruptcy, it’s just lowering your taxable income due to loss. So “write-off” doesn’t really make much sense in this context.

            • fluke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe not the correct ‘legal’ term. But it’s splitting hairs really.

              He wants rid of his serious burden. And imagine he thinks that he can do that if he kills the platform. Instead of being on the hook for 44billion with the repayments and interest attributed to that every month, he can cut that down to a fraction.

              I’m not saying I have any idea how it works, or even if it’s possible. Mainly that I wouldn’t be surprised if it was.

    • Zithero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Buying Twitter and tanking it lets him write off a huge amount of money for 2023 and get his taxes back from the previous year.

      Also he gets to leverage Tesla stock as the company is growing more fiscally viable… Why does that matter? Why sell before it takes off??

      Elon bought Twitter with $12.5bn in loans… Secured with the same value of Tesla stock. He didn’t sell it…

      So it’s almost free money. If the stock takes off he can make out like a bandit, pay the loan off with 1/2 the value of the real stock once it rises, but despite making money can still claim an overall loss on Twitter…

      This is why he doesn’t give a fark if Twitter lives or dies. If Twitter dies it’s a write off, but because half the investment is literally a loan against Tesla stock he still treats it like free money…

      • Shikadi@wirebase.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a cap on loss deductions, billionaires don’t care about deducting losses. Also he didn’t buy it with Tesla stock, he put up Tesla stock as collateral.

        • Zithero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right…stock as collateral in a loan.

          It’s amazing what bullshit Billionaires can do.

          Also those losses are per corporate entity so he gets to use those caps multiple times on each corporation and on himself.