Hi everyone! I’m trying to prepare a live iso with a USB stick including the additional rescuezilla package (or, alternatively, additional packages for a live rescuezilla .iso). Sadly rescuezilla does not support encryption, and so I’d like to be able to create/encrypt an image on one single live iso, not having to do a double iso boot just for this. I’m trying to do this in a manner that I won’t need internet once I need to use this USB stick. And hence…I found the most quoted command as:

apt-get download $(apt-rdepends |grep -v "^ ")

But this seems to work ONLY if your package is also part of the repo. If it’s an external .deb such as rescuezilla_2.4.2-1_all.deb is, then the command just fails with:

Reading state information... Done
W: Unable to locate package ./rescuezilla_2.4.2-1_all.deb
E: Handler silently failed

So…what can I do to download the many dependencies of rescuezilla onto a USB stick? Thanks!

  • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Install Distrobox first and work inside that container.

    Messing with dependencies of a program not in your package manager can result in bricking your OS (which will take some time to fix and that will be annoying).
    In DB, all dependencies will be self contained and your host OS will stay clean. You can imagine it similar to how Flatpaks work.

    Then, follow the other’s procedures.

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks! How does this work with OS permissions? As it’s rescuezilla and veracrypt I’m trying to use, both need access to the system partitions in order to be able to mount/read/copy to them. Flatpak can be a bit limited regarding permissions…Moreso on a live iso I guess.

      • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        DB only gives you the dependencies, but is otherwise not sheltered. It still has access to all host OS files, including hard drives and other stuff.

        Sadly, I’m not super experienced with it, and I use it on an immutable distro, where can’t change that much, at least nothing on the root level.

        You would have to read the documentation or google it yourself sadly, I’m out of luck here for you.

        I still hope my suggestion was successful :)

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The whole mechanism of working of Clonezilla is about the least intuitive I have ever found. So many chances for errors/mistakes, especially if you’re trying to do a network backup. Rescuezilla invokes clonezilla as a backup mechanism, but it saves you all the trouble with a way more intuitive UI. It’s been a revelation to me since I found about it, and refuse to use clonezilla alone.

      • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah that’s for sure, it’s pretty user hostile.

        It’s not open source but I absolutely love Veeam Agent, it will backup an online system with encryption, very easy to use, and they provide a bootable recovery image to restore from.

      • ipsirc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You missed the correct path.

        W: Unable to locate package ./rescuezilla_2.4.2-1_all.deb

        Use the correct path to your deb file.

        • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Still not correct. The path is perfectly correct. Even using full path. This method EXPECTS a repo package, not a file. I already figured the answer, it’s in this thread.

          • ipsirc@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I think you have confused the apt command with the apt-get command. apt-get doesn’t handle files, while apt has it since the very first version. This is one of the important differences between the two commands. This was one of the main reasons why I have been using only apt for years.

            • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Again, incorrect. The answer is above. And still, you haven’t read the thread. This is NOT about getting rescuezilla to install in the current PC. This is to get it to install in a DIFFERENT PC, which happens to be OFFLINE. So apt by itself will FAIL when it tries to resolve dependencies.