I find this move concerning, and wish that the Founder had looked for a new CEO that shared his values rather than a Private Equity and Mergers Expert.

Furthermore, the change to the GRIT motto is worrying. Trust is useless without Transparency when it comes to code and security.

  • pwxd@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Great. Now I have to move all of my password to another services because of a stupid decision made by a company.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Great I bought a paid subscription for it all this time for it to end up like this, I’m done with anything that is not self hosted now on, I’ll just convert my old laptop into a home server

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    The company has long defined its values with the acronym “GRIT,” which used to stand for “Gratitude, Responsibility, Inclusion, and Transparency.” After May 4, it changed the acronym to stand for “Gratitude, Responsibility, Innovation, and Trust.”

    It’s not as bad as the headline seems. Transparency is still in the motto. The actual change is:

    before

    after

    But still. Why change it at all? Why replace “inclusion” with “innovation”?

    It smells like Tech Bro.

    There’s just no way to spin that positively, even giving them the benefit of the doubt, especially since they aren’t rolling it back. Someone spent effort to make that values change, so its not an accident nor a “nothingburger”.

    • u_u@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s the change from “users” and “community members” to “customers” for me.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I don’t need my password manager to innovate anything. I would very much like it to include support for all of my tools and machines though.

    • brownsugga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Removing ‘inclusion’ smells like a pivot to the right, same way DEI is a target for maga

    • Seenitbefore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Ty. So many comments here didn’t see your post and others did but didn’t read it. My take is innovation is a greater priority, and trust protocols. I’ll watch but I’ll wait for it to be a something burger.

    • Padit@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Well, trust is literally the oposite of transparency. So i would call it quite bad, especially if you consider that right now i trust these guys with my credit card details, my taxID, all my passwords.

      • gnufuu@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Exactly. In cybersec, trust is someting you try to avoid or at least minimize. Trying to use it as a selling point is ridiculous.

          • zqps@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            That’s what they are trying to communicate here, yes. But 8.5 million users didn’t need to be told they need to trust the platform, they chose to. As did I with a premium plan to cover MFA and attachments.

            Now with business types in charge and a hidden doubling of the fees, that’s more than halfway out the window no matter what the website stands for. I’m guessing somebody decided it’s time to cash in on the goodwill they built over the past decade.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        21 hours ago

        That’s a great point.

        I don’t want to trust them either. I don’t want to have to.

        The only “devil’s advocate” argument I can think of is they’re trying to appeal to enterprise clients (who would not know that and want to “trust” a security company). That would explain the “I” change: “inclusion” (sadly) sounds political, “innovation” is like corporate catnip. Bitwarden could be trying to attract big fish to fund development, having their cake an eating it.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Because the “inclusive” part is already described by the first letter’s “story”?

  • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I guess it’s time to move to vaultwarden sooner rather than later… This wasn’t supposed to be the weekend project, but fuck it; let’s roll with it!

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      My question is move to vaultwarden, and trust they will still develop the open source client apps, or just preemptively move to another system. The UX isnt perfect, but it seems a lot easier to use than kerpassxc. Time to do some research.

      • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Very easy to migrate to vaultwarden from bitwarden I think, so I’d probably do that and hope the clients are forked if ever needed. I’d probably just live with vaultwardens web ui before swapping completely to keepassxc (because setting up keepass db sync to all devices manually doesn’t sound fun).

        • Derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          No personally using KeePass, but I’ve heard Syncthing is great to sync the database. Might wanna try to look into that.

  • new_world_odor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Ah for fuck’s sake. Seems like every month I have to change something because some fucking company starts getting a taste for greed via data sucking. I’m goddamn sick of it.

    • kuerbiskernoel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s why you use open source alternatives everywhere :) just replace one at a time when the company fails

      • new_world_odor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Unprompted snark from an .ml user, how surprising. I am a bigger cheerleader for open source than any of my friends or family. It’s the only real path to stay free of corporate influence, greed, and spying (in regards to software). Live free or die.

        Bitwarden is, by definition, open source. It has been since I started using it ~6 years ago. I’m tired of literally everything having the potential for enshittification. Nothing is safe in the long run, not even volunteer-run projects. If you think your favorite project is safe because of some “core ethos” or “guiding principles”, you’re just drinking the kool-aid. As long as we exist under capitalism, anything under the sun can be enshittified.

        I will never give up, even if things seem even more dire than they are now. But I’m tired of having to maintain constant vigilance.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      In this case, not having a motto would have made them able to get further down the enshittification path before anyone noticed. They just warned us.

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        though this also points out why such things as companies having “values” is laughable and should be ridiculed if they arent clearly enforced. All they do is scam people into thinking they might not be explitative shits which shouldnt be allowed or looked kindly upon.

        So many people have to switch services now and even more will just become victims of the company after it becomes more shitty. All those people could have used some other service that is less likely to go shitty, which in turn would have given it more resources to improve.

  • motruck@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This is not great but the strength of vaultwarden on the back of the bitwarden brand will give us forked clients as soon as they stop allowing self-hosters to set their instance.

      • mxanew@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It does but some of my passkeys didn’t work after migrating my bitwarden database

    • ButtDrugs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I just went all in to bitwarden 🙃. Not ready to change again just yet but will be ready probably once it starts going to shit.

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I upgraded to premium last year. Never heard about the price increase until this article. But frankly the change in leadership is more concerning to me than that.

  • VirtuePacket@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Gr8. Yet another critical service soon to be gobbled up by PE. I guess I’m moving to Proton Pass.