• stappern@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    how? i mean you are just saying its wrong, you haven’t said anything or explained why.

    • myslsl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only response you’ve given is “that’s not harmful”, which is in no way an argument for why it isn’t. It’s not totally inconceivable that taking things, even data, without permission can be harmful and to claim otherwise seems willfully stupid and in this case self serving.

    • myslsl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only response you’ve given is “that’s not harmful”, which is in no way an argument for why it isn’t. It’s not totally inconceivable that taking things, even data, without permission can be harmful and to claim otherwise seems willfully stupid and in this case self serving.

          • stappern@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            they would be wrong, taking something involves moving that thing from its original position to a new position. you need to touch or move the object somehow, without even talking about the fact that you would remove it from somebody else possession.

            none of that happens when you download a copy of a movie or something. none.

            • myslsl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’ll take your approach. No, that’s not what “taking something” means, because clearly the definition they’re using for that is more inclusive.