Since Elon Musk became Twitter’s CEO, he’s been pushing through a lot of changes to the social network. But perhaps…

  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m dark mode everything, everywhere, but options are good and taking away options is bad. If people want to sear their retinas by using light mode, they should be able to.

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use light mode because dark mode is far more likely to trigger migraines in me. This is legit an accessibility issue, and he fired the entire accessibility team.

      • thingsiplay@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        @stopthatgirl7 I also often use light mode on most websites. Since 2 years or so I started using dark mode on several applications or websites as well, but most dark modes suck. Some give me headache or burn my eyes.

        Taking the option is really an accessibility issue. Elon tries every trick under the sun to destroy the platform, in ways I could not imagine or forgot. I’m sure there will pop up addons for browsers at least to change the style. Everyone else, good luck.

        • Alaknar@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Try the “Dark Reader” plugin (works for all chromium-based browsers and Firefox - at least). It lets you customise the “darkness” of the dark mode to your hearts content. I have most of my sites set up so that they’re more “very dark grey” rather than black.

          Doesn’t always work nicely, some sites get their images mangled, or the text will get a weird shade that makes it illegible, but overall, it’s great. And you probably can fix most of these issues by tweaking the filter settings.

        • phi1997@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The thing is, I don’t think he’s deliberately trying to destroy the birdsite. He’s exhibiting the same mentality as the billionaire who got himself and a few others to die in a faulty submersible. He thinks he knows better than everyone but is completely out of touch from reality because his money usually shields him from consequences.

          Elon Musk is just an idiot. A useful idiot to those who fund him like the Saudis, but an idiot all the same.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            > Elon Must is just an idiot. A useful idiot to those who fund him like the Saudis, but an idiot all the same.

            He’s a useful idiot to us as well in lots of ways. The current EV situation only exists because of him. Space travel etc is only happening again because of him.

            • phi1997@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Keep in mind if it weren’t for him, the USA would have started building high speed rail by now. And remember that the ego rockets have a massive detrimental environmental impact.

              • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                >Keep in mind if it weren’t for him, the USA would have started building high speed rail by now.

                Elon Musk doesn’t control if the government builds a high speed rail or not. If the Government wanted a high speed rail line they would have started building one by now.

                >And remember that the ego rockets have a massive detrimental environmental impact.

                Calling them “ego rockets” is silly. Those “ego rockets” are better for the environment than normal rockets, and they’re helping to further mankind.

                  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Why did you conveniently leave off the rest of my sentence there?

                    Also come on…talking about how many birds might have died from the rockets explosion way up in the sky, when the likely answer is zero? Really?

                • phi1997@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  California had plans to build high speed rail. Elon Musk convinced them to fund his hyperloop project instead.

                  Remember that recent SpaceX rocket that exploded on the launchpad? That pollutes the area and could have been predicted by any actual expert. It’s a waste of resources when the society needs them elsewhere.

                  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    > California had plans to build high speed rail. Elon Musk convinced them to fund his hyperloop project instead.

                    So who’s fault is that? The people that decided to give elon musk the money. Why on earth would they go with a private company instead of building a public high speed rail? That story doesn’t make any sense.

                    >It’s a waste of resources when the society needs them elsewhere.

                    What resources are wasted in SpaceX rockets that society would otherwise use elsewhere?

                  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    > > > Remember that recent SpaceX rocket that exploded on the launchpad? That pollutes the area and could have been predicted by any actual expert. > >

                    It did not explode on the launchpad. It exploded 4 minutes into flight, at an altitude of 39 kilometers.

                    There was no “pollution” in the area. A bunch of pulverized concrete and sand got thrown around. They actually did expect the pad to be damaged by the launch, just not quite to that extent; they already knew they would need to rebuild it with a more robust design but figured it would survive one test launch so they delayed the planned renovations until after the launch.

                    Even if it had exploded on the launch pad, it would not have polluted the area, Starship is fuelled with liquid oxygen and liquid methane. Whatever didn’t burn would have simply evaporated away.

                    If you’re going to criticize Elon Musk or SpaceX you should use criticisms that are actually based on real facts, otherwise you end up hurting your position.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah light mode doesn’t work for me but why in the name of the gods would I want that to mean it’s not an option for other people? Compulsory light mode is bad. Compulsory dark mode is bad. But Elon seems to have incredible trouble believing other people are a thing to model, let alone actually doing the modelling. It sucks, and I am sorrowful for people like you and thingsiplay for having the internet get less useful for you and having this dipshit providing a bad example for other people with too much power and too little wisdom.