Why do some cars have their engines in the front and some in the back, what are the advantages and disadvantages of the two builds. And why doesn’t every car have full wheel drive?

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    23 days ago

    Just pasting an AI answer here. Thought it could be interesting to compare with the actual answers real people share:

    Okay, let’s examine the available information to address your questions:

    The placement of the engine in a car (front, mid, or rear) has various advantages and disadvantages:

    Front-engine cars:

    • Advantages include good traction, efficient energy transfer, and more cabin space since the engine is not in the cabin. [1]
    • Disadvantages include less-than-optimal weight distribution, which can affect handling and performance. [1]

    Mid-engine cars:

    • Advantages include excellent stability and handling due to the central weight distribution. [2][3]
    • Disadvantages include less cabin space, more complex design, and difficulty in regaining control if the car starts to spin. [4]

    Rear-engine cars:

    • Advantages include excellent traction and handling, especially in snow and ice conditions, due to the weight distribution. [5][3]
    • Disadvantages include less stability and the engine being in the rear can make the car harder to control. [5]

    As for why not every car has full-wheel drive (AWD), the main reasons are:

    Cost - AWD systems add complexity and cost to a vehicle, making them more expensive to manufacture and purchase.[6]
    Weight - AWD components add significant weight to a vehicle, reducing fuel efficiency.[6]
    Packaging - Accommodating an AWD system can be challenging in terms of vehicle design and interior space.[6]
    

    So in summary, the engine placement and drivetrain configuration involve trade-offs between performance, handling, cost, and packaging that automakers must balance based on the target market and intended use of the vehicle.

    • XTL@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      That’s a very optimistic wording on front engine and traction since it’s actually the worst option. It’s not quite wrong to call it good, as it’s usually good enough.

      Also 4wd is just flat out unnecessary waste except for some extreme condition. I live in the land of ice and snow and 4wd would be nice, but unnecessary, for about one week a year. Rest of the time it’s just weight, cost, and ecological waste. For most passenger cars, it’s a bad compromise.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        That is interesting!

        I’d have expected that adding weight on the axle that has drive would improve traction (but affect steering negatively)

        Also i guess that the answer does not take into account who uses the car or when. I guess in racing, awd would be awesome if it wasn’t too heavy, complicated and used a lot of fuel