• Baahb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    That feels a lot like your personal interpretation. You do not get to decide how people who call themselves Christian define themselves.

    Fables are worth listening to for the morals they include. Why wouldn’t an ancient holy book be a moralistic guide to show the way to heaven, whatever that is which is not defined in scripture

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m going to start calling myself “muslim” then, as “muslim” means “one who submits to God”

      • Baahb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You go ahead and do that. Worth noting that Islam doesn’t have a protestant reformation thats come in to say “f this the rules are whatever I want them to be personally,” so it’s basically still in its Catholic hegemony phase.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          The protestant reformation didn’t do that. In fact, it was the opposite. It was based on the Bible over everything and shedding the idea of a pope who can claim “the rules are whatever I want them to be personally”

          • Baahb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            But that’s literally the second thing to happen in the protestant reformation. King Henry saw that Martin Luther guy and said “shit if he doesn’t have to listen to the Pope, I don’t either. Let’s strait up rewrite the Bible motherfucker!” So that the parts he didn’t like didn’t apply. Are you gonna say anglicans aren’t Christian?