• RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I might miss the point, but the height is dependent on both parents genetically, so just comparing mothers with daughters is a bit like the usual “correlation does not equal causation” thingie, or not?

    • tehevilone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The X and Y are just labeled weird, both graphs reference father’s height has the X and mother’s height as the Y

      • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, but there is no graph comparing son vs mother and daughter vs father.

        And it seems like an odd thing to omit.

        • tehevilone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          If I’m reading the referenced link right, the data is from 1886(?), so it’s not terribly recent, either.

          • Grubberfly 🔮@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            yes, 928 children and 205 parents it seems.

            wonder how the trend shown here has changed in almost 150 years…