• GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    The lengths that the military surveillance state will go to in order to invade our invade our privacy. This has nothing to do with terrorism, fraud or child porn, this is 100% him not allowing back doors to his app.

    • doodledup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This has nothing to do with privacy either. First of all Telegram is not a private messenger. Secondly, this is a about public forums and groups called Channels. This has nothing to do with backdoors eithe. They are simply asking them to do moderation on chats they already have access too.

      Telegram has full access to this data and knowingly ignores child pornography and other criminal activity. If Facebook did such a thing for years you’d be screaming right now.

      • Jack@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I haven’t seen CP on either platform. How are you sure there is CP in telegram? How do you know there isn’t on Facebook?

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think we all know that it has definitely appeared on both platforms. I think it’s a case of “what did the company do about it?”