It is probably due to a number of people stopping using their alts after some instance hopping.

Also a few people who came to see how it was, and weren’t attracted enough to become regular visitors.

Curious to see at which number we’ll stabilize.

Next peak will probably happen after either major features release (e.g. exhaustive mod tools allowing reluctant communities to move from Reddit) or the next Reddit fuck up (e.g. removing old.reddit)

Stats on each server: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You think collectively antagonizing, using “libs” in a derogatory form and calling others “imperialist running dogs” constitutes as defense and not toxic behavior?

      • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        Calling out imperialist running dogs isn’t toxic. Just like being aggressively anti-racist isn’t toxic. If a person upholds capitalism, which is by nature exploitive and anti-egalitarian, they are toxic and deserving of rebuke.

        • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So as long as they don’t ideologically agree with you it’s acceptable to be toxic towards them, because their “wrong ideology” makes them toxic?

          Are you also aware that most of the proletariats unknowingly uphold capitalism? Considering you say they’re toxic are you against the proletariat or are you a fake socialist trying to create a class divide, the ones who agree with you and the ones who don’t, within the proletariat?

          • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            if you asked questions in good faith, you’d know that the community is also aggressively welcoming to such people, even when we disagree. but you don’t so you won’t.

          • SmokinStalin [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Those are good questions that you could get good honest answers to if you wanted. Other hexbearians are much more articulate than me.

            We are aggressively welcoming to anyone who’s genuinely just trying to learn. stalin-approval

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            So as long as they don’t ideologically agree with you it’s acceptable to be toxic towards them, because their “wrong ideology” makes them toxic?

            Think about this in the context of, idk, race science or something. Let’s say you have someone who is openly a big fan of Charles Murray, owns a copy of The Bellcurve, gets the whole nine yards. Would you deny that such a person is necessarily toxic?

            • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Actually, without any other context, I would. I would label them as misguided. Just because they believe in what I believe as the wrong thing doesn’t mean they’re automatically toxic. If they’re unwilling to even consider alternate perspectives or decide to just be antagonistic then they’re toxic.

              • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                So if they come in swinging about how they “don’t deny” that black people are genetically less intelligent and say that their opposition is either propagandized or propagandists, that would tilt the scales for you?

                • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why would it? If they’re open for discussion there’s clearly something to discuss.

                  • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    We might be running into a Nazi Bar, paradox of tolerance type issue here. If you treat him that way, there’s a fair chance that he’s just going to use the opportunity to propagandize to whoever will listen.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “insult” sure.

      He effectively called a porcupine spikey.

      What’s funny about hexbear is the users reflexively rise to the fight every single time, they can’t just scroll past.

      Taiwan #1

      • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        yes, it’s on purpose - we actively discourage lurking and encourage engaging with bad takes. the more you complain about it, the harder we go at it.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “bad take” really depends what side of the echo chamber you are on.

          Y’all respond to criticism like kim jong un is standing right behind you lol

          Also we aren’t in hexbear right now

          • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            obviously whether a take is bad or not depends on your politics. it’s so obvious I’m surprised you’d bother pointing it out.

            Y’all respond to criticism like kim jong un is standing right behind you lol

            this isn’t criticism. it’s just a snide aside.

            Also we aren’t in hexbear right now

            again, obviously.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right, being in a federated instance isn’t lurking. Glad we agree.

              And no I don’t, I’ve had a few meaningful discussing with some true leftists but most of y’all only have a knee jerk reaction available to criticism. You end up pushing near-allies away for lacking your dogmatic devotion, seemingly to xi? As you have a bunch of photos of him saved?

              • Bakzik [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                As you have a bunch of photos of him saved?

                xi xi

                dogmatic devotion, seemingly to xi?

                che-smile che-smile

                You should come to Hexbear. Have a real look around. Not being a fan of NATO bombing (like Yugoslavia) or puting children in cages at concentration camps at the border, doesn’t mean someone is a dogmatic follower of China. But they are far better that USA, that’s for sure.

                But come to Hexbear, let’s challenge years and years of western indoctrination. And we also have an awesome colletion of emojis! (or, as you call it, “photos”).

                fidel-cool

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        “insult” sure.

        He effectively called a porcupine spikey.

        Wonder how the porcupine got its spikes . . . Must be its authoritarian personality!