• rigo@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is questionable though in most states in the US atleast. Not sure how someone who lives a 20 minute drive from the nearest town in the middle of nowhere is supposed to ride a bike around. The whole world isn’t urbanized

    • Yabai@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right that currently it’s hard many places in the US thanks to suburbs, terrible zoning, car focused laws and so on.
      But it’s not like biking itself is the issue here, it’s that you are in dire need of better infrastructure, zoning, public transport and laws.

      • rigo@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Again this is semantics. But this isn’t true. Look at the entire state of WV or any state that is mountainous. Unless magically millions of people get in much better shape there isn’t an obvious solution. I’m all for better infrastructure and public transport.

        • newde@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As long as all the urban areas in the US are unfriendly to bikes, it is a completely valid point. Not semantics. We are talking about 80% of the population who could be biking, but aren’t do to terrible policies.

      • rigo@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, I’m not debating that point. I’m 100% in favor of doing that. I’m asking about solutions for everyone else. This debate is usually framed as “all we need to do is” when that isn’t the case for everywhere or everyone. Just diving into it a little bit more.

        • anji@lemmy.anji.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah a solution for the remaining 20% would be great, but we (the US) are not even addressing the urban 80%. I live in the SF Bay Area. It’s incredibly dense here, yet riding a bike is impossible/suicidal. It takes me 20 minutes to get to work by car, but 2 hours by bus. This needs to be fixed first before worrying about small town Montana.

          • rigo@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep yep, again. Agreed on all counts but that isn’t what the original comments or the article was about. Which is why I brought it up in the first place. I think it’s generally agreed that the more urbanized places would need revamping first. I’m just specifically asking about ideas in rural areas because that’s where I’m from.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then different solutions can be put in place in these places and/or you start with cities and figure out the country side later.

      I think the bigger issue you have in the US is the sprawled neighbourhoods, I’m not sure how you can get back from that, maybe recreate small centers in the middle of them.

      • rigo@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are the different solutions? Genuinely asking. Seems like a large aspect to skip since it represents the majority of the US LOL

        • trident_burger@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Provide regularly scheduled public transportation that feeds into denser urban areas. Make it easy to bike in denser urban areas.

          • rigo@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            So to provide regularly scheduled public transportation we would need to build out rail infrastructure to country areas? I suppose a park and ride system would be effective but what would still require a mass buildout.

            I’m thinking of areas like this one I attached. The nearest cities are 1hr drive from most towns, the cities are all small-midsized so don’t have that many jobs (proportionally) in the first place. The solution is to put train stations in every town? Every other town? Then the cities themselves would need to build out rail infrastructure because Albany and Syracuse have very little in the way of public transportation.

            Genuinely asking, not trying to come across as snarky. This is actually a middle-ground example. I could show you a map of WV or Western PA if you really want to see rural.

            • trident_burger@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean…yes? Absolutely, improve rail infrastructure in Albany and Syracuse. Build park and rides at places that feed into that improved system. Improve bus service (or train? Looks like there are already tracks in many places) along higway corridors with moderately sized communities.

              Can counties or cities currently afford this without sacrificing something? No.

              Would the federal government and states need to spend hundreds of billions, if not trillions, over several decades to make happen? Yes.

              • rigo@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah the track system is largely in place (not sure if freight or passenger). I’m not trying to argue lol. I’m just asking questions. So in your world there would be a mass spiderweb of intersecting trains that sprawls out to everywhere (obviously a kind of park and ride situation) and that would feed into the cities or other communities.

                Makes me think about the whole idea of the Green New Deal that Sanders was talking about when he ran the first time. Get a giant workforce of people out there building railways and stations. Would be interesting to see for sure.