Visual artists fight back against AI companies for repurposing their work::Three visual artists are suing artificial intelligence image-generators to protect their copyrights and careers.

  • lunarul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    AI is supposed to work with human input. AI is a tool for the artist, not a replacement of the artist. The human artist is the one calling the shots, deciding when the final result is good or when it needs improvement.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely.

      Yet a lot of people are sharpening their knives in preparation to cut the artist out of the process.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the difference in results is clearly different. There are people who replaced artists with Photoshop, there are people who replaced artists with AI, and each new tool with firther empower people to try things on their own. If those results are good enough for them then they probably wouldn’t have paid for a good artist anyway.