Three visual artists are suing artificial intelligence image-generators to protect their copyrights and careers.

Visual artists fight back against AI companies for repurposing their work::Three visual artists are suing artificial intelligence image-generators to protect their copyrights and careers.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    11·
    1 year ago

    You are drawing parallels where I don’t think there are any, and are asking me to prove things I consider self-evident.

    I’m no longer interested in elaborating, and I don’t think you’d understand me if I did.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.worldEnglish
      21·
      1 year ago

      This is what it always comes down to - you have this fuzzy feeling that AI art is not real art, but the deeper you dig, the harder it gets to draw a real distinction. This is because your arguments aren’t rooted in actual definitions, so instead of clearly explaining the difference between A and B, you handwave it away due to C, which you also don’t explain.

      I once held positions similar to yours, but after analysing the topic much much deeper I arrived at my current positions. I can clearly answer all the questions I posed to you. You should consider whether you not being able to means anything regarding your own position.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        11·
        1 year ago

        I am able to answer your questions for myself. I have lost interest in doing so for you.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          But can you do so from the ground up, without handwaving towards the next unexplained reason? That’s what you’ve done here so far.

          • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyzEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            Yes.

            I once held a view similar to the one you present now. I would consider my current opinion further advanced, like you do yours.

            You ask for elaboration and verbal definitions, I’ve been concise because I do not wish to spend time on this.

            It is clear we cannot proceed further without me doing so. I have decided I won’t.

              • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyzEnglish
                1·
                1 year ago

                Not today. I have too much else to do.

                And it’s not like my being concise makes my argument absent.

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  2·
                  1 year ago

                  The issue isn’t you being concise, it’s throwing around words that don’t have a clear definition, and expecting your definition to be broadly shared. You keep referring to understanding, and yet objective evidence towards understanding is only met with “but it’s not creative”.

                  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyzEnglish
                    1·
                    1 year ago

                    Are you suggesting there is valid evidence modern ML models are capable of understanding?

                    I don’t see how that could be true for any definition of the word.