If so, was it polled somewhere?

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    official government papers

    What government? It seems like the website you cited disregarded sources because they were from governments. Do you need Chinese government documents specifically?

    • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yes. Just as I would need us government papers if I were to prove the us government is deliberately committing a genocide. Now what can I do to make you interact with the sources?

      • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        No problem buddy, let just quickly break into that one chinese government archive where they got all their nasty stuff, should be easy ;^)

        • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          Great, so you admit that all you have are the sources previously provided and the inherent flaws they contain zenz We’re operating from a point of agreement, then! We do not have strong evidence for the claims being made.

          • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            my dude, just because you can scour the internet for 20-30 articles that support your psy-op, while out right dismissing anything even tangentially related with main stream press as biased, doesn’t mean you have a point. It only means you’ve successfully created a bubble around you. Get outa here.

            • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              We don’t outright dismiss them you dip. We engage with your sources and show why they’re unreliable or non-factual. You’re the one handwaving sources away and refusing to engage any further. Talk about a bubble around you.

        • RedDawn [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The fact of the matter is that if a genocide was happening there would be evidence of it, but there isn’t. If anything on the order of what’s alleged in these sorts of threads were happening it wouldn’t even be possible to hide it. There would be tens of thousands of refugees flooding into neighboring countries at the very least. Instead, you can literally go walk around Xinjiang and see Uyghur people happily living their lives, or if you don’t want to do that you could watch any of hundreds of videos of other people doing that. Every Muslim majority country in the world sides with China on this issue, and only the US and it’s lackeys (countries famous for their deep concern about the rights of Muslims) are making hay about it.

            • RedDawn [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I just flipped through all 60,000 of them real quick and I gotta say, looks fake and made up. Since it only took you seconds to decide that this was bulletproof evidence of genocide, it only took me a few seconds to determine its fake.