• 4 Posts
  • 83 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 16th, 2025

help-circle













  • And I have said it ten million times before. The current total bans they’re doing is abso-fucking-lutely not going to do squat. You are basically saying ‘we should leave this and that model of rifle or shotgun only’ to somehow say ‘this will eliminate danger to kids’. Nope, because any rifle or shotgun can be technically used to commit a shooting.

    In 2010 in the UK a guy went on a rampage with a single-shot .22LR rifle and a double barrelled shotgun, the type of ‘safe’ guns most gun control advocates believe should be the only type of firearm available to civilians, and he STILL killed over 10 people.

    I remember reading articles by Heidi, the main gun control advocate in Canada who was present in the 1989 polytechnique shooting (she heard the gun shots, but was very far away from the actual shooter) who had a hatred of that particular model that he used in the shooting like somehow it was THAT model that was only thing that made it fucking possible. It wasn’t

    BTW, the model he used? Ruger Mini-14, and at that time (and somehow still believed today) that it was easy to convert a semi-automatic rifle into a fully-automatic rifle. He had a go at it and ended up breaking the mechanism, meaning the shooting that killed 14 young women that day was committed effectively by a jam-prone, manually operated gun. Not even a fast-firing semi-auto rifle.

    And I am going to say it again. The bans that have been happening in the past 6 years have been extremely ineffective, have not collected many of the banned guns (next to no owners surrendered their weapons, meaning they are still there), has been unbelievably expensive, have caused massive divisiveness in various governmental agencies, have lead to a huge rift in everything.

    And do you have any sense of irony? ‘ooooh think of the children!’ the same damn excuse that the guys on top everywhere in the world have been using to infringe on all of our freedoms? Whether it is the 2010/11 failed ‘protecting children from online predators’ act that only mentioned children and predators in the title and nowhere in the bill? Or the age verification crap going on, the OS outlawing, and a hell of a lot more.

    Even the anti-gun shit is getting so damn bad it is pissing off the 3D printing community and privacy advocates, since they want to pass draconian acts that think they will somehow curb 3D printed firearms (which aren’t a problem. If they were, we’d be seeing a fuckload more of them by now, but so far we’re still seeing boring old fashioned factory produced guns), and those laws are so crudely written and so impossible to enforce that they will effectively make it impossible for most people to 3D print anything, and will make 3D printers cost 5 or 10 times more. Same thing with machinist and metal working communities who are under fire because their skill at forging and shaping metal to something that could actually become a decent gun.

    Why are you so willing to use and fall for the same Epstein class cry when you aren’t for any other subject?



  • We don’t have a lot of mass knife attacks, we don’t have a lot of bombings, we don’t have a lot of poisonings, because as you pointed out they have a much higher skill/knowledge requirement. The thing you intentionally ignored is that the skill/knowledge requirement for pulling a trigger is really low.

    And LLMs would absolute reduce that friction to next to nothing, which would make it happen more often and more successfully.

    The Nazi incel shooter would NEVER have succeeded in any of his goals without the chat. It doesn’t matter that he had a gun (which was his dad’s gun, not his own), the chats revealed that he knew so little about firearms and the times when people gathered most densely that he if tried to do what he did without chatGPT he would likely failed to kill anyone. Injuries maybe, but not deaths. The guy was so ignorant on how to carry out an attack and without the support of chatGPT he might have gotten over his desire to kill and even suicide with minimal or no intervention.

    BTW, for explosives that I mentioned? There is a precedent on how reducing friction can facilitate a massive rise in bombings is the availability of bombing making instruction manuals. As I said, the internet is awash with them, but once upon a time they weren’t available… until BBSes in the late 80s and early 90s started having them And once people were able to get them there was a massive spike in pipe bomb incidents in the US at the time.

    Timothy McVeigh used such books in making the bomb he used to blow up the FBI building in Oklahoma city. They are still available.

    A bomb making guide reduces friction in making successful bombings, but if it were combined with an LLM who ‘just wanted to help with a fun experiment’ it would reduce whatever friction left to nothing.


  • If you have been paying attention to the gun control situation in Canada and how people from countless organisations such as Canada Post and the RCMP and tons of others have been reacting to this, you’d be amazed how many Canadians are opposed to it.

    And it is all 100% based on ‘I just do not like guns’ which I am going to say is unsufficient anymore than simply me saying ‘I just like guns’. Most people actually believe that somehow Canadians could conceal carry or were able to do so until recently or some other bullshit. Complete ignorance of the actual state of things.



  • Those rifle bans are dumb, but they’re basically how they’ve always done things. When they were deciding on what was a ‘restricted’ vs ‘prohibited’ rifle in the 90s when the licensing scheme first got into play, it was clear that they looked up a gun digest and simply picked out a lot of stuff at random and it made no sense.

    For example AK rifles were prohib, but ARs were not. AR rifles were restricted, but plenty of equally capable rifles were non-restricted. Some bans literally made no sense. The G41 assault rifle, an experimental German rifle that never went beyond the prototype phase, was added to the prohib list anyway. That gun was produced in such limited quantities and uses such unique and highly specialized ammunition (it was an experimental caseless round) that no criminal or criminal organization can get a hold of no matter what.

    The whole point is their thinking is ‘I hate guns and I want to destroy any and all shooting sports and hunting’ This even apparently is extending to subsistence hunters who need a rifle to survive. This is why the SKS is not yet banned even though they have been trying to for a very, very long time. If they ban that it will cause a hell of a lot of problems for a lot of people… and they’re still trying anyway!