deleted by creator

Sounds like you need to add some sleep statements somewhere in your deployment scripts if you want to deploy in 10 seconds

And I thought me and Qui-Gon Jinn

Could talk the federation in

To maybe cutting them a little slack

The actions of Nestle the company are more than enough reason for everyone to boycott them.

No they are usually much smarter about getting the policy changes they want.

The politics of the CEO is not a factor I generally consider when buying products.

Actually it’s KotKit

How’s your back?

Come on, we can’t replace him with something more competent

wo there

In Australia government funding is distributed to political parties based on the number of first preference votes they get as well so even if your first choice doesn’t get in, you still helped them by putting them first.

True, in those cases it might not even enter your conscience thought and just happen automatically.

Thanks so much for the explanation. As they say, when a measure becomes a target it stops being a good measure.

Relevant XKCD for good measure.

How can these businesses keep running? Storing and distributing documents isn’t exactly the most technically challenging product to build. I’m not in the field though so I’m absolutely certain I’m missing a lot of the nuances here. Can you shed some light on why you think nobody new comes along to our compete these folks?

It happens when they change something

Chat GPTME

Such great products. Now we get…image generation, inpainting and a conversational AI. All technically impressive, but those older products were actually functional and solved everyday problems.

Wow that is pretty damning. I hope Google is adding all this stuff in with the replacement of Assistant but it’s Google so I guess they won’t. I replaced Assistant with Gemini a while back but I only use it for super basic stuff like setting timers so I didn’t realise it was this bad.

They did the same shit with Google Now, rolled it into Assistant but it was nowhere near as useful imo. Now we get yet another downgrade switching Assistant with Gemini.

As I like to say, there’s nobody Google hates more than the people that love and use their products.

There is a lot of good stuff there but it’s still opaque when it comes to bias specifically. I mean, am I missing somether here? I genuinely feel like there must be a whole section I’ve missed or something based on some of the other commenters. The bias methodology is no more a methodology than “grind up some wheat, mix some water and yeast before chucking it in the oven for a bit” is a recipe for bread. You rate 4 categories from 0 - 10 and average it, but the ratings themselves are totally subjective.

Story Choices: Does the source report news from both sides, or do they only publish one side.

What does this even mean? If a site runs stories covering the IPCC recommendations for climate action but doesn’t run some right wing conspiracy version of how climate change is a hoax, is that biased story selection?

What did I miss here?

Good summary. I think the first point is the most concerning because it’s actively spreading misinformation and giving the appearance of credibility.