

Can a random person (my mother in law and other non techie family) connect to my tailscaled jellyfin using a Roku or AppleTV? I thought tailscale needs a wireguard client.


Can a random person (my mother in law and other non techie family) connect to my tailscaled jellyfin using a Roku or AppleTV? I thought tailscale needs a wireguard client.


I linked to the archaelogy.org article that discredited it with the relevent quote.


I think it’s the other way around. Jellyfin recommends docker.


"Alot of archaeology is coming up with wild ideas supported by often very limited facts, and looking at other relevant sources that may or may not support the theory.
Yet that is exactly what you are doing by suggesting a discredited idea.
“But no evidence of strife—much less an adjacent settlement to defend—has been found at Monte Sierpe.”
https://archaeology.org/issues/march-april-2026/features/return-to-serpent-mountain/


I tried switching and I’ll try again. But getting https reverse proxy was a lot of moving parts that I never got working.
The instructions were a long chain of learning:
Install ngnx for reverse proxy
Ngnx only available as docker
Install docker
Docker not working because I don’t understand it.
Install podman
Give up and go back to 3d printing where I have a backlog of stuff that actually needs to be done.


Read the article.
“Researchers noticed that the pits were arranged in repeating numerical patterns and grouped into sections, suggesting a deliberate organisational system rather than random digging.”
“Band of Holes may have operated like an enormous outdoor spreadsheet or inventory system.”


The bribes are from China. It’s not getting reversed.


No, because the media is controlled by Republicans.
OpenAI and others have had data centers training models for 10 years. Chatgpt was released in 2022. A data center was churning for years before release to create that model.
Yes LLM’s can beat humans in many tasks. But the jump from super spell checker to real AI is still huge.
It’s like the 1960’s where computers were beating chess players. (Not grand masters but they could beat regular people.) Because a computer could out think a regular human, people assumed that with more resources, we would have real AI in 25 year. That was Hal from 2001 Space Odyssey. It seemed very reasonable in 1968.
No but if you don’t try, you won’t find where the Goblins are hiding.
Real inclusiveness would be for Ken Jeong to play Samuel Jackson in his biography.


The Chromebooks didn’t magically appear. It was a social decision to use them.
Guns are perfectly safe too. They cannot do anything on their own. Yet a society that allows unrestricted gun ownership without regulations or training will have problems.
So yeah, it’s not the technology.


You didn’t answer the question.


I think Chromebooks as a supplement to books are fantastic. But instead they have completely replaced all books. This means lessons are broken up into small chunks of information which reinforces the limited attention span problems that already exist.


I blame Chromebooks.


Thats 8000 people with experience running social media that could use their knowledge and wealth to build the Fediverse and competitively reduce Meta’s monopoly.
That’s 8000 people who would use their knowledge to monetize the Fediverse by selling bots that push agendas.


“Neurotypicals never learn masking, because they have never had to.”
Kinda bullshit.

Nemo πs me keyboard?
I added the link within a minute of posting and long before you replied. You must be on another instance to not have seen the change before you replied.
BUT IT DOESN’T MATTER. YOU MADE THE ASSERTION THAT SCIENTISTS ARE WRONG. IT IS YOUR JOB TO DEFEND YOUR ASSERTION, NOT MINE.
You are like Ben Carson declaring that, “Pyramids were built to be granerys, prove me wrong.”
No, because there would be evidence of something military related or military adjacent. They said there was nothing.