I teied using termux as a “linux” on androis before, but tbh I dont quite see the use case.

Termux as it is is great for ssh-ing into my headless server and executing commands. But everything else i do on my phone / tablet is something that a phone/tablet can already do, so idk what to do with (a bit clunky) x intterface. I tried programming via termux on my tablet, but that wasnt that great either since for text files a proper vim setup would have worked as an ide for me, and graphics accelerated stuff (ie opengl vulkan etc) are (ofc) not supported with this termux linux.

This seems interesting, and I might try it.

But… I’m kind of sick of web applicatioms. Why does everything need to be a web application or a “not” web app using electron. (In this case I see the use case and reason, but in general)

Could someone detail why? Why is MIT license troublibg?

While I mostly agree, I’d like to point out that GOFAI (good old fashioned AI) exists, and at its core it is basically just pathfinding like a* or something similar. And we still call that AI, because it “intelligently” finds a path quickly.

So my main point is that I agree that it isn’t magic or sapient or anything, but in a sense it is definitely intelligent.

I’m using firefox on android as well, but i cannot find the “install” option anywhere, could you point me in the right direction?

BobbyBroccoli

Dude makes hour long (or longer) videos / (videoseries) about scientific topics, such as “America’s missing supercollider” or “Man who tried to fake an element”. And they are all done really well.

Link: https://youtube.com/@BobbyBroccoli

I agree Arch isn’t magical. And I’m more than aware of the issues with the AUR, however i disagree that everything on there can be found by other means. There are several programs (such as optimus-manager for nvidia and integrated video card laptops) which are pretty much only found on the AUR (Not counting Github). Again this is about ease-of-use (Since you could build my example from github as well).

Obviously you can customize anything anywhere, what sets Arch apart is pacman and aur. And again in the case of Manjaro and EndeavourOS these and the wiki are the main “selling points”.

Arch is just the easiest one to start from a very minimal system and build something up that’s totally yours

Minimal ubuntu and fedora exists as well. And if you were to customise them you’d end up with something that you like as well. But i see what you are saying and i agree.

To answer your question: AUR. Aur is something that I love about Arch.

Also please stop gatekeeping. Installing Arch by hand instead of using something like EndevaourOS doesn’t mean anything. I used EndevaourOS after using arch simply because it was way faster and easier to configure. It still has all the functionality of arch (since essentially it is arch).

If you don’t want to spend the time to completely customize your system just don’t use an Arch based system

Thats the thing. You can still customize everything and anything. I mean what’s stopping you from using a tty and changing things? Also even the installer helps you customize a lot of things…

I agree completely.

As a sidenote: If somebody wants something easy-to-use that is arch-based I’d suggest EndevaourOS.

Fun fact: This is a post from mastodon which got posted to the c/technology on lemmy.world since it was tagged :D