![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
Thanks for the info!
I crossposted this to (what I considered) the relevant communities, where I added that as an edit.
Moved from @Crul@lemmy.world
Thanks for the info!
I crossposted this to (what I considered) the relevant communities, where I added that as an edit.
AFAIK, they are used as relays.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-bit_computing#1-bit
Computers and microcomputers may also be used, but they tend to overcomplicate the task and often require highly trained personnel to develop and maintain the system. A simpler device, designed to operate on inputs and outputs one-at-a-time and configured to resemble a relay system, was introduced. These devices became known to the controls industry as programmable logic controllers (PLC).
See also the playlist linked in the other comment with more explanations:
1-Bit Breadboard Computer - Usagi Electric (YouTube)
For those curious about 1-bit computers, see Usagi Electric’s playlist:
You’re welcome!
FYI: You can edit the post and include a link to the add-on so others can see it without reading the comments. EDIT: Thanks!
Image Max URL (Web - GitHub - Firefox addon) was able to get a 3840x2160 version.
If you use the address bar frequently, you may be interested in JS bookmarklets with params:
Thanks!
I tried Pixelfed (very briefly) not so long ago. I didn’t find a propper way to search for content. How do you discover new content?
Kill Sticky to “Kill off the annoying floating things blocking the website you’re trying to see.”
Notes:
FYI: I keep using it, it kind-of-works for me if I open the tab in the background and let it load (< 1min) before focusing on it. It also works if I’m not logged in (e.g.: in incognito mode).
Yep, that’s why I added the twitter source too.
Source: https://www.commitstrip.com/2015/04/27/the-eye-opener-commit/
Also on twitter:
I think you’re confusing “arbitrarily large” with “infinitely large”. See Wikipedia Arbitrarily large vs. (…) infinitely large
Furthermore, “arbitrarily large” also does not mean “infinitely large”. For example, although prime numbers can be arbitrarily large, an infinitely large prime number does not exist—since all prime numbers (as well as all other integers) are finite.
For integers I disagree (but I’m not a mathematician). The set of integers with infinite digits is the empty set, so AFAIK, it has probability 0.
Doesn’t it depends on whether we are talking about real or integer numbers?
EDIT: I think it also works with p-adic numbers.
!unix_surrealism@lemmy.sdf.org ?