When you normally delete a file, it doesn’t actually delete it, to save time it just marks the space as free, so any new files can be written into that part of your drive.

But the actual data just remains there until a new file is written to the storage.

SecureErase does the second part without making an actual file.

Normal delete:

File: 01010101 -> no file:01010101

Secure erase:

File: 01010101 -> no file:00000000

…They said waydroid

It could also have been a ghost listing, but yeah, I’m baffled they aren’t profitable

Probably didn’t see them, Epic’s already suing again because of their compliance plan.

I mean, yeah, but it’s a caucus in a primary with an heir apparent and was held on a night with horrific weather. I don’t think we can conclude that much.

It’s literally the most accurate information we have, unless you have something other than vibes to back up your view.

I doubt it, at least in the US. Samsung tends to be pretty locked down.

The main gain would be losing any tracking youtube does on how you interact with their app. They could only track based off what videos your ip address watches.

Isn’t ubuntu pro free up to 5 devices

Do you remember what that extension is?

For android, I use https://revanced.app/

For desktop, I use https://freetubeapp.io/

Not concerning at all, pilots aren’t important to a plane.

I mean, I don’t want biden, but Phillips is basically just biden except young, basically every policy he has the same or worse position as biden.

open source definitely plays a role in Linux security, but it’s minor compared to stuff like market share, user privilege,

Is saying the role open source plays in Linux security is minor compared to the role other aspects play, not that the attacks are minor.

I like how you just ignored the comment you replied to which acknowledged linux makes up most servers and instead just argued against a guy you made up.

Oh yeah, definitely but those tend to be different attacks than would target random consumer computers.

Being open source definitely plays a role in Linux security, but it’s minor compared to stuff like market share, user privilege, package management vs just installing random exes, different distros using different packaging systems.

Not really, windows is most targeted because it’s most used. If Linux had comparable market share it would be attacked way more.

There’s the Intel management engine and the amd platform security processor. Both manage low level tasks like booting, and have access to network data. Amds psp is known to have unrestricted access to user memory.

There have been security vulnerabilities that would grant access to sensitive data exploiting both systems if not patched.

As for a backdoor, there’s no evidence but I wouldn’t be surprised. The NSA has programs to insert backdoors into consumer products and these seem like the perfect place to do it. But again, there’s no evidence either chip is part of these programs.

Guess you just needed to call in the ntsb to look for plane parts next time.