So far, „sky“ is pretty nice

Im fine with republicans getting the secret detail they deserve.

Dogs would be a good example for ring species, which show the outer limits of the species definition, if they they occurred in the wild in their many diverse forms. But since they are not, I’d group them as one species still, as their origin is artificial and so are, at least partly, their means of reproduction.

In theory: yes, most likely. In practice? No.

To be frank, that’s the fault of most of the worlds forest management systems. You get what the article calls „new wood“, when you raise trees in open spaces. There they can rapidly expand and grow, and be felled early on. If you see forestry as plantation circles, which most of the world still does with those enormous clear cuts, you will get this kind of growth. However, if you raise forests in a more adaptive model with focus of the individual tree and a constant management, you can still manage to produce wood that is like the „old growth“ shown here. The trick is to keep the natural development of the forest in a stasis, where you take out just enough trees to promote the sprouting of new trees, but can control the rate at which they grow. This varies of course from species to species. Ideally, you have a specialist administrating the process and monitoring the appropriate amount that can be felled.

Id say let’s put him up for a test then.

The phylogenetic results, combined with these other lines of evidence, suggest that the high mortality in 1918 among adults aged ∼20 to ∼40 y may have been due primarily to their childhood exposure to a doubly heterosubtypic putative H3N8 virus, which we estimate circulated from ∼1889–1900. All other age groups (except immunologically naive infants) were likely partially protected by childhood exposure to N1 and/or H1-related antigens.

The Spanish flu apparently had the N1 complex present, to which the 20-40y population wasn’t exposed. At least that’s my limited understanding after skimming the paper.

They argue that people born before 1889 (?) were exposed to a virus similar to the Spanish flu, whereas people born in a timeframe directly thereafter were not. They experienced a different virus that wasn’t as closely related. Thus their antibodies weren’t as prepared.

Why do people need to be close to death in order to be eligible?

Hitler im Original ist grausam. Allein seine seitenlange Tiervergleiche. Ich kann Serdar Somuncus Lesung von Mein Kampf sehr empfehlen.

I highly recommend actually reading “Mein Kampf”. After the opening paragraph we should talk again about Hitlers intelligence.

That man was an absolute buffoon, but he was highly intelligent in a social sense of the word. Not entirely unlike Trump.

Get a feddit.de account. They defederated with most porn servers, so their all is almost porn free. If you want you can use an alt for porn on another server.

Or for historical context: “der Deutsche Michel” - “the German Michael “