No no, that would be absurd. You’ll also be turned away if you are not on the list if you’re unlucky.
No no, that would be absurd. You’ll also be turned away if you are not on the list if you’re unlucky.
And what, someone’s account being new means their contributions are somehow worth less? They were not actively trolling or anything
Shock diamonds my beloved
It can, if some laws are changed. Which is possible, although the largest video game producers will probably raise hell to not release any control they have.
Of course force may need to be used when people act criminally. In case of tax evasion, that may be seizing the amount owed and/or imprisonment in severe cases.
Say someone steals from a store and the owner demands it back, but the thief says “nu-uh”, what then? Is it morally permissible to use force to get your property back?
Ah yes, the well known connection between “let’s have a very high tax bracket for billionaires” and “let’s literally go and murder rich people because I don’t like them lol”, you got me. Oh, and sanctioning criminal behavior with prison = psychopathy, got it.
Good idea, will do tomorrow.
Here’s a good visualization of the wealth the richest people on earth command vs pretty much everyone else: https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/
A billion dollars is so incomprehensibly more than anybody needs, no matter the size of their family, that there really is no reason to take these things into account. As for who decides what is enough, it’s the people allowed to vote.
As for the donation example, yes, that is worse, since for every billionaire that miraculously donates some of their wealth, there are loads who don’t. So better tax them all than hope that maybe a couple of them decide to be nice for once.
“I know bonds, I have the best bonds. This is the best bond in the history of bonds, maybe of all time.”
I wish, but I don’t see it happening. Most people are just content with seeing ads absolutely everywhere, I just don’t get it.