… Her name was Christian Faith?

Can you give a bit more information on which video this was? We’re subscribed mostly for non-drum stuff and I’d like to know which video contained this crap to evaluate further steps.

He died and most of them ended up in positions of power in post war germany?

World-2023 ESN Publications and London Organisation of Skills Development Ltd

About 100000 pages. If you read a page per minute, continuously without breaks you’ll lose over 60 days of economic activity to this. This would massively disrupt the world if everyone had to read it.

Go tell this to a fencepost near your home.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7395139/2026/06/25/sophie-cunningham-pointing-dewanna-bonner/

Get better soon

https://olivia.science/ai/

“Let me be clear: LLMs and AI technology can be a good tool if used correctly but an over-reliance on it leads to situations like these.”

… No.

The LessWrong/online-“rationalist” kind of smart

You’re correct about the equivalence of meat eaters and chatbot users, but going in with “I’ll fix em” is also a shitty way of conducting personal relationships.

That’s a girl

Real AGI would just be a person. As in: Jeff from accounting, but artificial. Not particularly dangerous, but also very much not on the path of LLM development on account of being qualitatively different.

So… yeah.

If folks find the tools useful, by all means stop.

Wasn’t it evertim?

To be clear: the direction I’d like to see isn’t ignoring larger-scale changes but embracing that these things are linked. Companies don’t burn fuel for fun, but for profit (or non-capitalist modes of resource allocation - if the central party committee decides to satiate the people’s hunger for meat and cars, that’s also a problem). And the profit there comes from all of us, individually as well as collectively. So action against that probably should also happen on both levels.

I’m being a bit annoying about it because the companies don’t burn all that crap for fun but, as you laid out, for our collective consumption patterns. I developed the impression that the whole “x companies do y% of emissions!” thing, similar to “no ethical consumption” reminders tends to fulfill a function not aimed at motivating larger-scale changes (e.g. banning animal agriculture wholly instead of making an individual choice to not consume em; banning ICE cars from being produced/sold while creating comprehensive public transport instead of merely biking to work yourself) but at detaching oneself from the role we do actually play in society. (Also, smaller/individual scale weirdoes are a good source of activists that can radiate social structures out into general society)

No, why do they produce all the emissions?

Huh, odd, why do they do this?

Full size as it would be printed on a physical page vs large size as it’s in the database, maybe