![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
Hamas agreed to conditions that were not what Israel put forth. That means they refused to accept those conditions.
Hamas agreed to conditions that were not what Israel put forth. That means they refused to accept those conditions.
Gaza needs to be abide by the ceasefire
Hamas has a long track record of breaking ceasfires. Their demands usually include releasing terrorists that were caught trying to murder civilians within Israel in exchanges that are 1000+:1 with hostages/bodies they hold. For those who aren’t just tuning in just for this latest conflict, this isn’t exactly news worth even mentioning until an actual deal is struck.
Yeah, but headlines like this are just plain misleading. Hamas agreed to conditions that weren’t the ones put forth by Israel. That means it’s effectively meaningless, since we don’t know how much the terms were altered.
An official familiar with Israeli thinking said Israeli officials were examining the proposal, but the plan approved by Hamas was not the framework Israel proposed.
So Hamas accepted a proposal that was not proposed by Israel, effectively making this meaningless. Hamas will also accept proposals for Israel to stop existing, doesn’t mean that will happen either.
Looking at the content posted, that’s clearly a no.
You realize the name Palestine is what the Romans renamed the land to add insult to injury after kicking out all the Jews.
The hardware still looks so great, but responsiveness has gone to the shitter in recent years.
Mr hackerman couldn’t get to the car because it crashed first due to a software bug the customer did not have time to take his car to the shop to fix.
The real world is quite different than the idealistic one.
And how often were they actually followed vs discarded because the customer just didn’t care?
You do realize your entire first point is invalidated by the comment you’re replying to? I just said the customer has to press a button on their phone to initiate the update. On that same phone they can view release notes that clearly outline the recall. Additional on first use, the car will display those same release notes on the screen.
Sure, safety vs convenience is a huge factor in software development. The biggest factor to safety is unpatched software. You know, the kind that requires significant effort to update, such as needing to bring your car into the shop to apply.
Overall your doom and gloom argument against OTA safety updates is pretty weak.
Right, because the recall for the icons on the screen needing to be a tad bigger is as serious as uncontrolled acceleration of a giant hunk of metal.
They need a new name for software update recalls and physical recalls. They both need to be serious, but a distinction is needed.
Recalls still require the customer to take action. They’re much less likely to go into the shop to have it fixed than press a button on their phone and have the car fix itself overnight.
Your suggestion for not allowing safety software fixes OTA is dangerous.
Or because anyone in China working normal hours already left for the weekend because they’re 12+ hours ahead of the US.
Samsung store does that too. It’s quite annoying
Makes 0 difference. The charging circuit is in charge of that logic and will accept whatever voltage is supplied (within spec) and step it down to what the battery needs.
I wonder if this usage captures vehicles as well. I know the 2016 Honda I owned was running android 4.4 or so.
They all do it now (except USPS?)
So you’re saying you’re no better than him?
They won’t do that. It increases the risk of finding out how many Republican representatives watch gay and incest porn.
It’s almost as if they negotiations are on going and this article is just a media outlet trying to get clicks and a narrative going without any concrete info to report on.