![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/43e66c26-9809-4f90-a45c-6e4cc61685fa.webp)
In India. US number is 35%, here are some numbers for Europe: https://i.redd.it/d8udyq9edyhc1.png
In India. US number is 35%, here are some numbers for Europe: https://i.redd.it/d8udyq9edyhc1.png
Average in the US for a 2 bedroom is $1317 per statista.
Triple that for a monthly income = $3951
x12 for annual = $47,412
/2080 for hourly full time = $22.79/hr
A 1 bedroom (or 2br with a $200/mo UBI) at $1100ish brings the minimum to $19ish.
A 2 bedroom but working 60hrs/week or using 50% of income on rent instead of 33% is around $15/hr.
Just trying to play around with the numbers to see what a real political proposal might look like. Feels great to meme a declaration, people start disagreeing when you start putting numbers to it.
From context clues it seems like they were hosted on Lemmy which is why they are now limiting image hosting.
You can put fake meetings on your calendar and say “oh, gotta get to my 2:30”.
Michigan GOP is in shambles because they elected the “outsider” MAGA candidates who had no fundraising experience, they immediately failed to fundraise enough, it got so bad that their flagship annual fundraiser was a fraction of its normal size.
Instead of pulling together to right the ship they…immediately turned to conspiracy theories, declared each other to be Deep State plants, and demanded the party leaders “open the books” to show how much money there really was, but party leaders refuse because it would prove how bad at fundraising they have been.
Detailed in a recent This American Life.
Pretty sure it should be “valuation”
The nihilism of legal consequences has so far come from the lack of charging him with anything, mostly when he was president and the policy was not to charge him with anything. He hasn’t actually gotten away with anything that has gone to court.
He lost the E Jean Carroll suit and the Trump Corp fraud case. The other stuff is still ongoing.
Personally I had way too many quality issues at that price range. An earbud would be randomly quieter than the other, the battery of an earbud would die, the Bluetooth would suck, or they would be unusable for phone calls. I bought refurbished $100-something headphones for $70 and haven’t needed to buy any more since.
There’s a famous example of the poverty trap that uses boots that fall apart every season vs quality boots that last, and I think there is a quality level that is so bad it’s more expensive in the long run. So I do buy shoes that cost money. But I’m not buying fashion shoes or luxury brand shoes which I think is what you’re saying too.
The Australian billionaire who leaked the nuclear sub info he got from Trump bragged about doing that. Called it a cost of doing business.
It’s not for doing nothing, it’s for doing things he already did. He got the stock as part of his compensation plan at Microsoft.
And a dividend of $0.75 per share is 0.2% interest at the current share price, he could get more in a savings account and 20x that in a CD or something. The dividend isn’t crazy high. He just had a shitload of their stock.
Executive compensation as a whole is a story, but Steve Ballmer is not doing anything particularly noteworthy.
This comment did not go where I thought it was going but very interesting. You’re clearly making the right call for your personal finances.
I assumed you were going to say something about like expensive composting equipment or aluminum straws.
That ‘immigration is bad’ would actually be the vastly more common incorrect belief.
This is extremely common, the purpose is to prevent or at least identify racist hiring practices. How else are they supposed to know? They get an idea of who is applying, and an idea of who gets hired, and they can look at population statistics, and thus tell whether a disproportionate amount of certain minority groups are being rejected by a certain manager or the company as a whole.
Or alternatively you can tell if a job posting disproportionately has applicants of a certain demographic, so maybe white men tend to be hired in that job but it’s because the applicant pool is 95% white men. That would show that it’s not necessarily the hiring managers with the issue but either the HR outreach or the job itself has requirements disproportionately held by white men, and you can decide if that means you need to change something or that’s just something you need to live with for this role.
It’s allowed as long as it is only used for these purposes.
I had a job for a really long time with no raise, finally quit a few months before my job became minimum wage.
There’s some subset here who are just trolling the polls or giving the answer that supports their candidate regardless. But even reading this flatly, I think that’s fine for Biden. He’s never getting the “poison the blood” vote, that’s the 42% of the furthest right 50% of the country.
But then there’s the 58% who don’t like this. A large number of them will still vote for Trump in the General if they vote because they still like him better than Biden, but this is one more thing making them maybe not vote, maybe protest vote for a 3rd party, whatever. That’s something.
What a quote. Unions are literally the thing that stops a lords and peasants kind of thing.
My first big corporate job had internal salary ranges posted for when you’re looking at a new job within the same company, and I had to reckon with this as a new employee. I’d see basically my job posted with my salary on the far low end of the possible range and when I discussed it with folks I learned that the posted median salary is the median for everybody in that job, including people with 10 years of experience etc. So even if I’m impressing as a kid fresh out of college, the median isn’t the right metric to judge myself against.
It’s crazy that these non union auto makers are giving their employees a raise of less than half of the union raise and we’re all sitting here not mentioning that the raises themselves are a great reason to unionize.
Sure, “Hey you wouldn’t have gotten that raise without the union raise” might be true but “Hey you would be making more money if you were unionized” seems a heck if a lot more persuasive to me.
People don’t “like him for it” they like him despite it. Just because people like an unlikable person doesn’t mean they like everything about him.