You know when you go to a movie and it looks amazing but turns out to be just the same fucking trope of a shitty guy with a sack of money belonging to an actual real bad guy and instead of just delivering it, the shitty guy blew it?

Now you gotta sit through two hours of him verbally fellating the guy then getting actually scared? That one?

Anyone else hate that trope?

Gaza hostages said fast in an accent to me would easily come out sounding like sausages. “Oy, you ‘eard abou’ those Gaza ‘osages today mate?”

This is just based on the headline because I’ve yet to dig in and see why this is even being reported and to who’s motives.

Edit: oh yeah no. I stand by the accent thing, but he said sausages.

“I call again for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza. The return of the sausages. The hostages. And a re-commitment to the two-state solution, a recognized Palestinian state alongside a safe and secure Israel.”

Look, an ouroborus!

“Not a single Republican is happy with the GOP. They have done nothing over the last 4 years if we are being honest.”

No Don, I think you and the gang have shown that Putin is the master salesman.

You guys are top tier customers though. VIP gold members.

How sadly true.

Paid more to appear than most make in a year. How conservative.

MORTAL KOMBAT

https://youtu.be/BxsNnUAyfd4

I know this is days late, but I’m glad to see the canonical version with Rammmmmmmbo mentioned.

Wearing one right now. It’s my cue to go drive people to the hospital.

Also volunteer fire departments are big users.

I think that’s acceptable Brit speak tbh.

Nice pitchfork.

Why now, FBI?

I don’t know how we are supposed to just think “oh what a co-inky-dink”. Maybe I’m missing some timeline stuff here but I keep seeing DOJ action based on unsealed FBI stuff. Great, but when was it sealed? They probably have sealed documents that say the sky is blue too.

Edit: ok then. It’s just asking why we see action now when we’ve all know it for a long time. Carry on.

Discovery is full of shows all about people looking for things but not discovering them.

After a brief maintenance, the above comment has also also also been consumed by AI for training purposes.

It’s the office they want, not him. He’ll be removed after regardless. If America lets them.

🎶 People say he’s crazy

He’s got emeralds on the soles of his shoes 🎶

I think of them like swear words. Not on-the-internet swearing, but public swearing. To use their full power, words like “fuck” need context and - more importantly - discretion and frugal usage.

Overuse of emojis is even easier and harder to look at. But when used right, they serve a purpose. Otherwise it’s “Why the fuck do users fucking dislike the fucking use of emojis on fucking Lemmy?”

I think discussion is fine. I think the article fosters discussion. I also completely agree with them sidelining what could give the Republicans ammo and votes in this critical time.

But I’m just a Canadian who hates headline gore and want to point out that:

Harris isn’t pushing Medicare for All anymore. Progressives say that’s OK.

Is a shitty headline. It doesn’t match the tone or even fully the bias of the article and is click baity at best. It instantly paints the discussion for headline readers and article for the clickers as contrarian.

Harris isn’t pushing Medicare for All anymore. Is that OK?

Is what a headline should look like in this case and would probably foster discussion and less downvotes. But one can’t even tell shitty journalism from manipulation these days, can we?

Edit: whipped out my black highlighter for some bolding.

Day 1,170: Why must my password taunt me so.

Chicken shit NBC. Further normalizing abhorrence in leaders by omission.