The toddlers are going to be running the day care. Buckle up.

Thats how words work u use combine multiple concepts together to create a new things that encapsules the whole.

Sure, you didn’t do that though. Let’s take the second item, “The existence of systemic oppression and power imbalances”

That’s the original definition, not what right wingers use to deflect away from the original. You’re all over the place.

For instance if u where to define a table as having legs a table top etc then some moron claimed well i have legs ur definition sucks that wouldnt be a good faith interpretation would it?

I’m interpreting in good faith, the problem is on your side. You’re trying (and failing) to assign a definition to something that doesn’t have one other than “anything mush-brained right wingers don’t like”. Just accept it instead of tying your brain in knots.

Do u have an alternative word u would prefer me to use instead of woke to describe the outlined definition i provided?

You didn’t provide a definition, for instance “The importance of group identity over individual identity”. You might as well be talking about communism, or the military, or a sports team.

I love that you’ve tried so hard to lead a veneer of intellectualism to the contradictory and reactionary thought processes of the far right.

To sum up your post, you’re describing “anything mush-brained right wingers don’t like” but with fancy bullet points.

Exactly.

If inflation is 10% in one year and falls to 2% the next then stuff is still 12% more expensive than it was two years ago.

I can’t help wondering how many people who voted in the last election understand this though. Single digits?

Define woke.

As far as I can tell it now means “anything mush-brained right wingers don’t like” but maybe you can do better.

Stupid and proud of it.

Why is this comment getting downvoted so much? Asking someone for evidence to support what they’re saying doesn’t seem unreasonable to me.

It’s not just the US, it’s been happening for years in other countries like the UK as well.

Traditionally there has been one party that is for working people and another for capital and the owner class.

The right has been getting further and further into far right authoritarianism. That posed a problem for the Dems going back to the Clinton Presidency: do they stick with being the party of working people or do they try to have their cake and eat it by tacking to the center and assuming that the working class will continue to vote for them no matter what?

It largely worked for a time and gave Obama two terms but ever since then they have been susceptible to criticism that they’re out of touch, elitists, entitled, and that they look down their nose at working people whilst still assuming that they will get their vote, which opened the door to Republicans.

You can’t serve two masters for very long, you can’t be the party of working people while being run by upper middle class graduates. You can’t claim to care about the people with the least while cozying up to CEOs and megadonors. Sooner or later it all falls apart, as it did with Hillary Clinton’s run, where working people disliked her elitism and she didn’t have enough support from elsewhere to make up the shortfall. That should’ve been a warning. Instead they doubled down.

The problem in the US is that there are only two viable parties. The Dems won’t go back to being the party of working people because they wouldn’t know how to do that even if they wanted to. What happens when the Trump Presidency turns out to be a disaster?

deleted by creator

I get that you’re upset but having a tantrum and accusing people you don’t even know of helping Trump is dumb.

Now do latinos and suburban women.

Singling out a single demographic for the target of your ire isn’t helpful.

See, this is why I rent.

It really shouldn’t be.

All I can conclude is that everything that I find absolutely disqualifying about the corrupt amoral lying rapist isn’t a bug for his followers, it’s a feature.

Double it, triple it, but they don’t get to accept a single penny from anywhere else.

AOC, I guess but we need more people who actually give a shit about the people they represent.

He’s 73 but somehow looks even older.

I hate that we still need him, he’s 83 and should be putting his feet up but I’m glad he’s down for another term.

You’re welcome, enjoy!