ok, that is your opinion, right?

As the trial about this Jan 6 event has not even started he is innocent until proven guilty, right?

For me it is the other way around. At home too much distraction. In the office I can focus.

by your logic, if someone stole something, have it to his brother and then got caught, having the brother give back the stolen goods is something Nazis would have done.

According to Sippenhaftung the Nazis would probably have shot the thieve, his brother, their parents, other family members and burned down their houses.

In case of societies you mean collective liability then?

The society in question (which exactly?) of today is not the same compared to the society of the past. How can it be at fault?

The problem I have with this viewpoint is this.

Where does it start and where does it end?

World history is full of atrocities, crimes, war etc.

Additionally, many of the things which we now consider atrocity or crime might not even have been one in the past.

Fabricating such artificial claims is the same as Putin is doing by using the history book for creating claims on Ucraine.

That kids or later generations are liable for past crimes or wrong doings (by todays standards!!!) is not fair and it is no justice.

In German it is called Sippenhaftung and was even used by the Nazis.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sippenhaft

For my taste your analogy is faulty.

You put it like it was a game of Civ.

The history and development of nations and cultures on Earth was/is much more complex.

It is moral blackmailing.

2019er Bild sieht irgendwie nach Photoshop aus.

That is very interesting.

I do not think that it is complicated to join or use.

But many do not care about privacy and centralization and hence will not leave mainstream platforms. Also the network effect is strong.