LegendofDragoon

I mean that’s the message he’ll spin for sure, but the Colorado suit was brought to the courts by Republicans trying to remove Trump from the ballot.

Or melk which is milk when pronounced with a couple of us accents

Vimeo Game cool

Well this case is apparently before judge Cannon who proved before that she’s willing to kowtow to the former disgraced presidents attempts to delay proceedings, so turning this down is pretty unlikely

Well here’s hoping, it’ll be a huge win for humanity if it works out and is, indeed replicable at any kind of scale. We haven’t had very many winds as a species recently, so any victory would be great.

Is it just the Beijing one that’s bull hockey or is the whole material itself bologna?

So many potential advances. Could quantum computing become more easily accessible if thermal load is a non issue? Could renewable become more viable if they don’t lose as much energy to travel?

Could its discovery propel high speed rail into the future?! Hoverboard?!

Well, a superconductor as the name might imply is a super conductor, meaning electricity flows very well through it with negligible resistance. This means generators of all types can be placed further away from where people are, especially renewables, like geothermal or offshore wind/water farms.

There’s also the possibility of commercial mag-lev that could revolutionize high speed rail.

Yes because surely antagonizing the company that employs the most of your constituents by quite a large margin can only end well.

My all time favorite was the Nintendo Nsider forums. Young me was devastated when they announced they would be shutting down

To your last point, Brown Vs. The Board of Education prevents racial segregation in schools, Loving vs. Virginia prevents state laws against interracial marriages, and Atlanta Hotel Vs. The US was the landmark finding that upheld the legitimacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, specifically the clause that prevents businesses from discriminating based on protected classes.

So to answer your question at large, we DO have actual laws on the books that are supposed to protect historically targeted minorities, but at any moment these rogue malefactors could declare any one of those laws unconstitutional as they’ve shown they have NO regard for precedent.

This law is obviously just an attempt to get a case that can strike down Griswold at the corrupt, illegitimate supreme court. They know it will get challenged, it’s exactly what they want.

I’m on kbin Greg, can you reply to me?

And it’s not like American hospitals don’t make money hand over fist

Talk to a major law firm about accepting the prize as anonymously as possible. Take the lump sum -payment to the lawyer team and divide it into thirds. One third goes into a trust that I can direct friends and family to with instructions to offer assistance for major life events, weddings, funerals, education and the like. That way I never have to be the bad guy who says yeah, no.

The second third will get invested into low risk bonds so I have a stable income forever

The final third will become what people normally do with lottery winnings, new home, that kind of stuff

That really will be the question at hand. Is the ai producing work that could be considered transformative, educational, or parody? The answer is of course yes, it is capable of doing all three of those things, but it’s also capable of being coaxed into reproducing things exactly.

I don’t know if current copyright laws are capable of dealing with the ai Renaissance.

I mean baby steps right? The next logical step from here is to teach the ai how to build a skeleton to go with the 3d model. Teaching it how movement happens to decide where articulation happens might be tricky though

It just sends you the Wikipedia link to new super Mario bros u

And it’s not like you can even abbreviate it since cp has its own problematic connotations when it comes to the Internet

Not to mention people are bad enough drivers when limited to two dimensions. Could you imagine adding a third?!