Permissive licences are useful compared to copyleft ones only for unfree actors, which we should fight integrally at every step of the way
- 0 Posts
- 11 Comments
Permissive licences should be the ones to fuck off entirely. GPL or death
Lev@europe.pubto
Canvas@toast.ooo•36 hours left! What are your favourite designs so far?
511·21 days agoGo to a Ukraine protest
Lev@europe.pubto
Dad Jokes@lemmy.world•What is Waluigis favorite quick stop place ?English
4·3 months agoWhat is Waluigi’s favourite George Harrison song?
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Lev@europe.pubto
Fuck AI@lemmy.world•Opera wants you to pay $20 a month to use its AI-powered browser Neon
21·8 months agoThe fact is that an AI assistant could also be quite useful at times, but people have to understand how the core functioning of a browser works (i.e. for the vast majority of things you use a search engine, not a chatbot), and its paramount to have a local AI for such services, in order to guarantee privacy and affordability
Lev@europe.pubto
Android@lemdro.id•GrapheneOS could break Pixel exclusivity in 2026 with major OEM dealEnglish
1·10 months agoI completely agree, and a strong copyleft licence is something that GPLv3 does much better than its predecessor, which is unfortunately why it has not been adopted by the Linux kernel. I foolishly assumed that GrapheneOS, given the values it professes, would be distributed under the GPLv3 licence, but I have now discovered that this is not the case, in a move that I frankly cannot understand. Hope that changes in the near future, but it’s not very likely to happen I guess
Lev@europe.pubto
Android@lemdro.id•GrapheneOS could break Pixel exclusivity in 2026 with major OEM dealEnglish
3·10 months agoThat’s the long-term plan, yeah. Moving from Linux entirely actually, as they mentioned a future microkernel project
Lev@europe.pubto
Technology@lemmy.world•GitHub CEO delivers stark message to developers: Embrace AI or get out.English
92·1 year agoDaily reminder that Codeberg is always the good alternative to corporate bastards like this idiot
If this were a suggestion about “kids” in general, I would agree with you about using the neutral plural pronoun. The thing is, here our friend is replying specifically to OP and offering opinions about what she should do with her son. In that case, I find it annoying and disingenuous to use “they” to talk about the kid, as not only do I find the use of a plural pronoun to refer to a single individual to be a poor linguistic choice, but it is especially so when the subject in question is specifically defined in regard to its gender.
I don’t understand why this opinion should be seen as a “gender war,” nor why the comment should be received with greater enthusiasm than its mild content implies
She’s talking about her twelve-year-old son, and that’s specified. What reason could you possibly have for using “they/them”?



No unfree application should ideally be allowed ever again