data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc1c6/fc1c6e060295b0c32fdf60d761c6f552be19111c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46069/460692bda71b4646fdb0a688218881341e90297a" alt=""
Pretending that the law matters during a fascist coup is not productive.
Pretending that the law matters during a fascist coup is not productive.
I think they would still be open to civil liability, for services that compete with TikTok or anybody who could claim harm came from companies refusal to follow the law.
I don’t even think we need to wait that long, anybody with a product that “competes” with TikTok would have standing to sue Google, Oracle, and Apple for violating the law and causing harm to their business. The possibility of government penalties in 4 years is just the icing on the cake.
Okay now China just needs to not sell and then in April we can sue Google and Apple out of existence right?
Sharks are older than both trees and the north star
Maybe it’s the fact he is a convicted felon? The fact he was even allowed to run is a massive loss already regardless of the outcome. As far as I am concerned anything short of a massive landslide against him counts as a massive loss.
Pardon my ignorance, which rule would apply requiring unanimous consent? And which one allows for debate when filling a vacancy? I can’t seem to find it.
If she resigned the California governor would appoint somebody to fill her spot, still giving democrats control of the senate they would be able to appoint somebody else to that committee, or am I way off base?
Nobody is saying it would solve the problem but it might make me feel a little better