Ransom@lemmy.catopolitics @lemmy.world•Alabama Supreme Court Cites the Bible in Terrifying Embryo Ruling
319·
8 months agoBecause it’s something that’s easily googled? Because it’s lazy to ask questions like that before trying to find it yourself?
Because it’s something that’s easily googled? Because it’s lazy to ask questions like that before trying to find it yourself?
Corporations acting all parentally “disappointed” because they were too cheap to properly code it isn’t okay.
A spokesperson for the supermarket said they were disappointed to see “a small minority have tried to use the tool inappropriately and not for its intended purpose”
Disappointed. Bloody hell. A company that’s too cheap to curate some actual recipes is “disappointed” because the tech they built is creating lethal recipes. I wonder what their liability is if someone tried and got hurt/sick.
What you’re teaching them to do is trust “experts” on the internet to give them unbiased sources. (And we know that there’s no such thing.) You might be an expert, I’ll grant you, but what happens the next time they ask about COVID and the only person who replies sends them a link about bleach light treatments?
There’s nothing wrong with answering questions, but I’d much rather answer the question “Is this link/source legit?” than “What’s the answer?” I think that’s more ethical, and more critical thinking can come into play by explaining why a source is or isn’t good.